LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Council rejects move on wind farm appeals 

Credit:  Crookwell Gazette, www.crookwellgazette.com.au 29 September 2011 ~~

A move for Upper Lachlan Council to obtain its own legal advice on possible appeals against “forced” land acquisitions by wind farm developers was rejected at its last meeting.

Cr. Malcolm Barlow sought this action in respect to Land and Environment Court decisions that require some landholders affected by the Gullen and Taralga wind farms to either sell their land to the developers or accept the close proximity of turbines.

This follows advice to Council from the Attorney General that he could not intervene in decisions by the Court.

“I’m not asking Council to make the appeal; we would ask the Government to,” Cr. Barlow said.

Cr. Sandra Bill seconded the motion “for purposes of discussion.”

Cr. Barlow said that the request would be coming from Council, not an individual.

Cr. Mike Coley was worried about “putting Council in a position where it didn’t want to be.”

Cr. Bill: “They’re really not giving these people (affected by acquisition) any alternative.”

Cr. Brian Moloney: “We could spend a large amount of money on our legal opinion, and if they come back with the same answer we’re back where we started.”

Cr. Barlow: “Even if it cost a few thousand dollars it would help to keep up the pressure. It’s not too much to ask Council to do this.”

Mayor Cr. John Shaw: “We’ve already done that.”

Cr. Barlow: “But not with legal advice.”

The motion was defeated with only Cr. Barlow and Cr. Bill in favour.

Source:  Crookwell Gazette, www.crookwellgazette.com.au 29 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon