[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Dozens more wind turbines may sprout  

Credit:  By ADAM STEWART, Staff writer, Peabody Gazette-Bulletin, www.peabodykansas.com ~~

Marion County Planning Commission recommended approving a second application for a commercial wind turbine project west of Florence, despite the protestations of one passionate opponent Thursday night.

Rex Savage of rural Florence is seeking a conditional use permit for his Doyle North 2 project, which would be adjacent to the Doyle North 1 project the county approved a CUP for in November 2010. The proposed project is mostly west and southwest of the existing project.

The area of the second project is suitable for probably no more than 20 turbines, Savage said after the meeting. If each turbine was built at the peak of current capabilities, the project could potentially generate 60 megawatts of electricity.

Both proposed projects are within the bounds of a wind energy overlay district established by the county, bounded by Sunflower Road on the east, Pawnee Road on the west, 130th Road on the north, and 90th Road on the south.

Savage had already addressed the county’s regulations on wind farms in his previous application, but the commission reviewed the regulations and Savage’s plans for the new project.

The county’s regulations require addressing the visual effects of wind turbines. Savage said that there is only so much that mitigation can accomplish.

“If they get built, you will see them,” Savage said.

Another concern is noise. Savage said that in the past decade, improvements in turbine design have greatly reduced the amount of noise they generate. The sound of modern turbines is about 65 decibels at the base of the tower and declines quickly as you move away from the tower. For comparison, 60 decibels is within the volume range of normal conversation.

Studies suggest a wind farm in the proposed area would have no significant impact on wildlife.

“If you can’t build windmills here, let’s just give up and burn coal,” Savage said, quoting one of the experts who studied the issue.

He said he anticipates having agreements with the county regarding bonds to guarantee repair of roads damaged during construction, bonds guaranteeing removal of the turbines when the project is decommissioned, provisions for equipment and training for high-angle rescues, and payment in lieu of taxes, because Kansas exempts wind turbines from property tax.

Savage said both projects are under contract, but said he couldn’t say any more in public because of non-disclosure agreements.

County Planning and Zoning Director Tonya Richards recommended including the same conditions for approval as the first project.

David Yearout, consultant to the planning commission, said developments in western Kansas have encountered problems digging trenches for underground wires. The problems arose because there are many abandoned oil lines in the ground remaining from oil exploration and production. Neither of Savage’s projects is likely to have such problems, he said.

The meeting was then opened to comments from the public. Although the planning commission initially proposed limiting comments to three minutes each, Nick Peters of rural Marion was granted 15 minutes.

He said he and his wife, Laurie, moved to their home south of Marion three years ago for the view of the Catlin Creek valley.

“We didn’t move here to live in an industrial park,” Peters said. “I want what I paid for. I want what I worked hard for years to get.”

Peters outlined his concerns about how turbines would affect the view, create noise, damage bird and bat populations, and lower property values.

“You have no idea how worried I’ve been about this all day,” he said. “I told my wife I thought I was going to throw up.”

Peters requested more time to rally others opposed to the project before the planning commission made its decision.

The planning commission voted to recommend approval by the county commission. The county commission will hear the recommendation at 10 a.m. Oct. 10, giving Peters about two weeks to rally supporters.

Source:  By ADAM STEWART, Staff writer, Peabody Gazette-Bulletin, www.peabodykansas.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.