[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Rumford discusses limitations and benefits for wind projects  

Credit:  By Erin Cox, Staff Writer, Sun Journal, www.sunjournal.com 27 September 2011 ~~

RUMFORD – Concerns over possible litigation with limiting the number of wind turbines and the effect wind projects have on real estate were discussed at another wind power ordinance workshop Monday night.

Selectman Jeff Sterling said he believed limiting turbines was new territory for wind ordinances.

“I’ve done a lot of research on other towns ordinances and haven’t been able to find anything about limiting turbines,” Sterling said.

He suggested the town limit projects to 25 turbines, based on projects he has seen in the past.

Town Manager Carlo Puiia said he talked with the town attorney concerning the issue and was advised the town needed to have a justifiable reason to limit the amount of turbines for a project.

Albert Aniel stressed the importance of limiting turbines to protect the landscape and real estate value of the area.

Puiia added that once one turbine is placed on a ridge it negates the point of ruining the scenic aspect.

Selectman Greg Buccina said he was concerned over litigation concerning limiting turbines, especially for aesthetic purposes, which may cause an ordinance to be thrown out in a court case.

“This may be why we aren’t seeing this in other wind ordinances,” Buccina said.

Selectman Brad Adley said he believed a limit was not needed.

“I think if we do our due diligence with the property and sound setbacks the ordinance would already limit the number of turbines,” he said.

The group agreed to add language that would limit the number of turbines to 25 and acquire a legal opinion on the matter.

Community benefits given to the town from a wind farm developer were also debated.

Buccina said he believed language should be inserted into the ordinance stating wind turbines would produce electricity for the schools and municipal buildings in town.

“I think we should do this and pass the savings on to the taxpayer,” he said.

Sterling suggested leaving the language vague on community benefits and allow future boards to negotiate any deals.

“What we may want today may not be what we need tomorrow,” Sterling said.

Adley agreed with Sterling and said he was not willing to bind a future board to a set of agreements on benefits.

Source:  By Erin Cox, Staff Writer, Sun Journal, www.sunjournal.com 27 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.