[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind blows cold on turbine plan  

Credit:  By Tom Hacker Reporter-Herald Staff Writer, www.reporterherald.com 21 September 2011 ~~

Wind might someday be a viable alternative energy resource in Loveland, but not with current technology and not with the skepticism city councilors heaped on the concept Tuesday night.

An hour-long discussion of code amendments that would permit homeowners to install wind energy systems in backyards or on rooftops led councilors to do … nothing.

“This is a feel-good measure,” councilor Daryle Klassen said after city planner Brian Burson described the proposal. “The ROI (return on investment) is worse than pathetic. … You’d be lucky if you could charge your watch.”

Loveland, according to maps produced by U.S. Department of Energy wind power researchers, is one of the worst places to install wind power generating systems, rated in the lowest of five categories for wind power potential.

And restrictions that the proposed code changes impose would make wind systems in the city even less efficient.

The code change allowing wind systems now remains on the shelf after nearly 18 months of work by city planners, the Loveland Planning Commission and a special code commission.

Some council members said deferring action on the proposal would at least allow for more information about evolving wind power technology.

Burson described “a huge wave of improvement yet to come along in the technology” that could make wind power more efficient.

“I think we’re ahead of the technology with this,” Mayor Cecil Gutierrez said. “But I don’t know that we want to throw all this effort away.”

Also at issue in the wind power discussion were the unknown effects of a state statute that prohibits local governments from banning certain alternative energy projects.

City Attorney John Duval said he would report later on the state law, with an opinion on whether a Loveland code change would be in conflict.

Burson acknowledged that current technology, and height restrictions that the city proposes, would make wind power generating systems more a matter for “hobbyists” than those interested in a viable energy alternative.

“It seems highly impractical,” councilor Kent Solt said. “It concerns me that it would be a ‘hobbyist’ sort of thing.”

Source:  By Tom Hacker Reporter-Herald Staff Writer, www.reporterherald.com 21 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.