[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Villagers celebrate government ministers’ decision to reject plans for sub station at Little Dunham, near Swaffham  

Credit:  By IAN CLARKE and SOPHIE WYLLIE, Eastern Daily Press, www.edp24.co.uk 21 September 2011 ~~

Campaigners are celebrating tonight after two government ministers rejected plans for a large electricity sub-station in Mid Norfolk.

But the energy company behind the project warned the decision could jeopardise the future of the £1.3bn Dudgeon offshore wind farm.

Warwick Energy wants to build the installation on 43 acres of farmland at Little Dunham, near Swaffham, to connect to the National Grid.

Against the advice of its officers, Breckland Council rejected the plans after hearing villagers’ fears about the impact that the 15m-high buildings could have on the landscape.

Warwick appealed and a planning inquiry was held earlier this year.

Planning inspector Christopher Frost but the final decision was made by energy secretary Chris Huhne and communities secretary Eric Pickles.

On Wednesday their ruling was published and they have dismissed the appeal and refused planning permission.

Warwick have six weeks to decide whether to appeal to the High Court and lost an application for costs against Breckland.

Paul Gardner, from the Little Dunham Action Group, said: “The village is going to be delighted. It is the right decision for the village and will protect the area for future generations. We said from the outset that this was the wrong site for such a project.”

He added that residents in the small community have lived the threat of the sub station for two years, which has caused “anguish” and “frustration”.

Breckland councillor for the area Mark Kiddle-Morris, said: “I’m absolutely over the moon for the people of Little Dunham. They have worked hard to fight this all the way through. The impact of such a project was felt to be so great on the countryside around Little Dunham, and the industrialisation of a field so close to a residential area outweighed the requirements of national policy for renewable energy.

“In the past we have not been able to say it was in the wrong place and refuse it on that basis but the Secretaries of State said it was probably in the wrong place.”

But Mark Petterson, project director for Warwick Energy, said he was “very surprised” at the decision.

He added: “With a refusal I don’t think we’ll recover the costs, which is disappointing, but that is the least of our concerns. The Dudgeon offshore wind farm project will be subject to a year’s delay because of this, whatever route we take.”

He said the outcome could “potentially jeopardise” the £1.3bn scheme.

The energy company looked at more than 100 possible sites for the industrial structure and shortlisted five across the county.

“If some people think you cannot build a sub station on rural land it cannot be built – this is Norfolk,” Mr Petterson added.

He said he was unsure if Warwick Energy will take the case to High Court.

George Freeman, MP for Mid Norfolk, said: “This is a great victory for the whole of our community, from the Council who initially rejected the proposals, to the dedicated campaigning of the Little Dunham Parish Council Group. I am happy that the Departments of Energy and Climate Change and Communities and Local Government have come to this decision and taken the advice of our local residents.

“As I have also said myself, the Secretaries of State have stated in their report that a substation is required and vital to the utilisation and distribution of off-shore wind energy and that an alternative site ought to be assessed, nevertheless the highlighting of the significant change to the perception of Little Dunham village meant that planning permission couldn’t be justified on this site.

“This shows just what can be done when communities, councils and MPs work together, and gives me confidence in the increased powers for local communities proposed in the Government’s Localism Bill. In the case of Little Dunham, the location for the substation was simply inappropriate.”

To see the full appeal decision visit the website: www.communities.gov.uk/planningandbuilding/decisionsplanning/secretarystate/recentsecretary.

Source:  By IAN CLARKE and SOPHIE WYLLIE, Eastern Daily Press, www.edp24.co.uk 21 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.