[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Developer appeals rejection of Cuminestown wind-power plan  

Credit:  The Press and Journal, 20 September 2011 ~~

A controversial northeast wind-power scheme that was blocked by councillors earlier this year could be resurrected.

Developers have lodged an appeal against Aberdeenshire Council’s decision to reject plans for a pair of 260ft turbines on the edge of Cuminestown.

Alan Twatt, owner of Alan Twatt Potatoes Ltd, hoped the structures at Cairncake Farm would boost his business.

However, the proposal divided the community.

Local authority planners got 212 letters about the scheme – with 105 in support and 107 against.

Backers said the project was a positive way of tackling climate change and would benefit the local economy.

They argued the masts would have no detrimental impact on the surrounding landscape, which is about two miles south-west of Cuminestown.

Opponents claimed the turbines would be unsightly and too close to houses. A campaigngroupsetuptofight the plans – Concerned About Wind Turbines Cairncake Group – argued the masts could pose a safety hazard. Members also raised concerns about noise pollution and light flicker.

In April, members of Aberdeenshire Council’s Formartine area committee rejected the scheme on the basis it would be too close to neighbouring properties.

This was despite backing from council planners, who said the scheme adhered to policy.

Now, clean-energy group Green Cat Renewables has lodged an appeal with the Scottish Government against the committee’s decision on Mr Twatt’s behalf. Aberdeenshire Council has been given 21 days to respond.

Mr Twatt had tried originally to put up the masts nearer his potato business at Gamrie, but the plan was refused after objections from air traffic controllers.

Originally the Cuminestown masts were to be just under 330ft, but their height was reduced amid concerns.

There are 13 other wind turbine applications either proposed or installed within a six-mile radius of the Cairncake site.

Source:  The Press and Journal, 20 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.