LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Heysham residents dismayed by turbine scheme 

Credit:  The Visitor, www.thevisitor.co.uk 15 September 2011 ~~

Heysham residents have been dismayed to learn that a controversial 110m-high wind turbine scheme just half a mile from homes is back on the agenda.

The giant windmill-like structure, mooted for land near Fanny House Farm on Oxcliffe Road, has been backed by council planners just two years after original proposals for two turbines were thrown out. But after developers British Telecom reduced their plans to just one turbine, the Ministry of Defence has withdrawn objections.

The MoD had been worried two 110m turbines would interfere with radar tracking of aircraft from Warton near Preston. BT has also moved the planned site 380m further away from houses than the original scheme.

Protests are expected when Lancaster City Council’s planning committee meets to make a final decision next Monday (September 19).

Thirty-seven letters from angry residents objecting to the turbines have been sent to the council, compared to three in favour.

David Morris MP has also slated the scheme, having backed a bill currently going through the House of Lords to build turbines well away from homes.

“I think BT is trying to sneak through this proposal before the bill is passed,” said a woman who lives on Ashcroft in Heysham.

“It’s too close to my house and I have reservations about the noise the turbines will make. This will be a blight on the landscape.”

See the The Visitor (14-09-11) for full story.

Source:  The Visitor, www.thevisitor.co.uk 15 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky