[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Whiteside panel gets mixed reviews 

Credit:  BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.com 14 September 2011 ~~

MORRISON – A Whiteside County committee is getting mixed reviews on whether it did a good job reviewing the county’s wind energy ordinance.

Residents pushing for more regulations say the County Board’s Public Works Committee didn’t do a thorough job.

Representatives of a company interested in setting up a wind farm give the panel a thumbs up.

Last week, the committee voted 4-1 to increase the required distance between houses and turbines from 1,400 to 1,600 feet. It suggested no other changes.

The 1,600-foot setback would be the largest in the state. Now, central Illinois’ McLean County has the longest at 1,500 feet, according to a Western Illinois University study.

The setback issue was referred to the board’s Executive Committee, which, on Tuesday, voted to delay a decision until next month.

Sterling resident Amanda Norris wanted to know what the basis was for the committee’s decision to increase the distance. She said the panel’s lack of effort was a “disservice” to residents.

She said the committee never had a serious discussion on issues such as the abandonment of turbines and the impact of noise on nearby residents.

“There has been an effort to dismiss information because it comes from the Internet,” said Norris, who is the president of Sauk Valley Tea Party. “You don’t have to go far for credible sources.”

Deer Grove Mayor Al Thompson urged the county to include property value guarantees in its ordinance. That would mean wind energy companies would have to compensate nearby landowners for drops in their property values blamed on turbines.

He noted that wind energy companies argue that turbines don’t hurt neighboring property values.

“If it doesn’t affect anything, they shouldn’t have any qualms with signing on to property value guarantees,” Thompson said.

Ireland-based Mainstream Renewable Power is planning a wind farm for Bureau, Lee and Whiteside counties. Only a small fraction would be in Whiteside County. The turbines would be near Deer Grove, population 48, which is south of Rock Falls.

John Martin of Mainstream told the Executive Committee that he appreciated the committee’s effort. He said the existing setback of 1,400 feet, along with special-use conditions, would be sufficient.

In reaction to the news of Mainstream’s plans, the Deer Grove village board voted in the spring for a 1.5-mile setback for wind turbines around the village’s boundaries. Now, some are questioning whether the village has that power. The state’s attorney’s office is researching the issue.

Executive Committee member Jim Duffy, D-Sterling, proposed the panel delay a vote until next month.

Members voted 4-3 in favor of Duffy’s motion. Duffy; Karen Nelson, D-Rock Falls; Sue Britt, D-Morrison; and Bill McGinn, D-Sterling, supported the delay, with Steve Wilkins, D-Morrison; Tony Arduini, D-Rock Falls; and Bill Abbot, R-Fulton, against.

After the meeting, Wilkins said Norris is following national tea party leadership, which he says is against wind energy.

Norris took exception to that allegation.

“This isn’t the tea party. This is me. I want protection for the taxpayers,” she said. “I’m not trying to drive out wind farms completely. I want them to meet requirements.”

Source:  BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.com 14 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky