[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbines near Castle Fraser get go-ahead 

Credit:  The Press and Journal, 14 September 2011 ~~

Two wind turbines will be built near an Aberdeenshire castle after councillors dismissed concerns they would dominate the landscape.

The 149ft structures will be built more than a mile from Castle Fraser, near Kemnay, despite planning chiefs telling councillors the plans were “completely unsuitable” for the area.

Area planning officer Darren Ross told members of the Garioch area committee yesterday: “This is a very sensitive landscape in this part of Aberdeenshire. These turbines arewhatwewouldclass as ‘ medium-sized’.

“The turbines are just visible at the entrance of the castle and when they are viewed from the actual castle the turbines are visible through the gaps in the trees.”

Mr Ross told the group that while the technical issues with the applicationhadbeen addressed, such as noise and shadow flicker from the blades, the impact the turbines would have on the A-listed Castle Fraser and its designated landscape could not be overlooked.

Applicant Philip Hopley was at yesterday’s meeting at Inverurie and assured councillors every effort had been made to ensure the turbines would not spoil the views of the castle.

Mr Hopley, who made the application through Turriffbased Muirden Energy, said: “Neither Historic Scotland or the National Trust for Scotland have objected to this proposal, but do have concerns regarding the visual impact. We have made every effort to address these concerns by choosing the most appropriate site further away from the castle, and positioning the turbines off the crest of the hill.”

He also told the councillors that hehad put forward plans for two smaller turbines rather than a 262ft structure, because he had decided that the larger ones would be detrimental to the castle and its surroundings.

Councillors backed the plans, subject to conditions.

Source:  The Press and Journal, 14 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky