| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Big utilities seek tax cuts for developing wind farms
Credit: BY BOB MERCER, American News Correspondent, www.aberdeennews.com 7 September 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
PIERRE – Representatives from several large utility companies that run wind farms in South Dakota called for tax reductions Wednesday as one of the steps to encourage more wind-electricity projects in the state.
They made their suggestions to a special task force created by the Legislature to study South Dakota’s competitiveness in wind energy.
The panel plans to meet a final time Oct. 5 to develop recommendations that will be delivered to the governor and the Legislature.
“We will be here with our sleeves rolled up,” said Rep. Roger Solum, R-Watertown. He is the task force chairman.
South Dakota’s program that provides tax rebates for large construction projects expires Dec. 31, 2012.
Wind-energy projects have been some of the biggest recipients of the rebates.
The possible replacement is a discretionary grant program that takes effect in 2013 if voters statewide approve it the November 2012 general election.
Company officials for Iberdrola Renewables asked for a complete repeal of state sales and use taxes and state contractor excise taxes instead, noting there isn’t any guarantee under the grant approach.
Iberdrola’s Ben Hach said that without changes a 200-megawatt wind farm in South Dakota will face $25 million more in taxes over its lifetimethan it would in neighboring states.
One of the task force members is Pierre lawyer Brett Koenecke, whose clients include Iberdrola.
NextEra Energy Resources proposed a “back to the future” approach.
Jason Utton, a project director, suggested South Dakota restore the large-project rebate program and the tax incentives for wind projects that were in place before 2010.
He said NextEra has invested more in neighboring states than in South Dakota.
Accione Energy’s Rick Murphy highlighted some of the same points.
All three discussed transmission as a barrier too. The task force was assigned by the Legislature to look at tax policy.
Basin Electric’s Ron Rebenitsch listed taxes as No. 8 in his presentation, just ahead of regulatory environment.
His top seven were transmission, federal incentives, power markets, renewable mandates, ability to access the MISO transmission grid that serves the Midwest’s urban areas, environmental regulations and local ownership.
Much of rural South Dakota where wind farms can be located is served by the Western Area Power Administration’s grid rather than the MISO grid, and electricity producers must pay access fees twice to put their power on WAPA in order to get onto MISO to reach consumer centers such as Minneapolis-St. Paul.
“It’s transmission, transmission, transmission,” Rebenitsch said.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=12735 ]
