[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Questions on a second possible site for Dartmouth wind turbine 

Credit:  www.southcoasttoday.com 7 September 2011 ~~

Dartmouth residents may be unaware there are now two sites identified for the industrial size wind turbines at the wastewater treatment facility: the original Chase Road location and a new Russells Mills Road site, closer to the Braga Memorial Drive access road.

Consequently, it’s possible residents along Russells Mills Rd./Gulf Rd. West could unknowingly find themselves affected by the noise and shadow/flicker from the turbines, where previously they might not have been.

And, with FAA approval, the town may increase the blade lengths from 80 meters to 90 meters, further affecting potential noise and shadow/flicker impacts.

Studies have shown long-term adverse health issues from wind turbines unsuitable for location in populated areas. The wind power industry and those anxious to see turbines constructed in Dartmouth will discredit these studies and declare the health problems as minimal, despite contradictory testimonials worldwide.

Residents might want to research the documented health problems developed from living under turbines, rather than accept as gospel reassuring statements of turbine safety from individuals who tout community greening and financial gain at some future date.

In 2010, Town Meeting eliminated the need for a special permit for turbine construction, along with legally required notification of immediate abutters, and the holding of public hearings. The amended bylaw essentially makes it easier for turbine construction in locations that residents would likely oppose, namely, close to their homes.

The town also has the option to lease land, thus increasing the potential number of qualified sites for their construction.

A map of abutters within 300′ of the turbine property line and studies of noise and shadow/flicker, are posted on the town’s website, www.town.dartmouth.ma.us. Residents might want to check if there is even the slightest possibility that their homes could be affected. Copies of these documents can also be requested from the Select Board’s office.

The map identifies only immediate abutters, however, and not abutters of abutters, so there is no definitive identification of all possible affected addresses.

Ideally, abutters of abutters would be notified of such life-altering construction as turbines, but such notification is likely cost-prohibitive, and might not even be a government requirement on any level.

A wind turbine is no ordinary structure, however. Its repercussions go beyond mere annoyance and inconvenience.

The magnitude of an industrial-size turbine with the potential to disrupt lives and affect health located in anyone’s backyard merits everyone’s attention, if only to illustrate how lives can change dramatically by the decisions of others, in this instance, locating turbines where residents live.

The town is considering placing the new turbine location as an agenda item for discussion and comment at a future Select Board meeting. (Check weekly under “Select Board’s Agendas” to determine when it will be addressed.)

It will not be the exclusive agenda item discussed at the meeting. However, it could be the only opportunity residents will have to familiarize themselves with the town’s plans to locate these turbines near their homes.

More than ever, it is incumbent on Dartmouth residents to remain well informed of what is happening in their neighborhoods.

What a sad commentary on our community when people’s lives take a back seat to whatever is “politically correct” at the moment. How unconscionable that finances apparently take precedence over their well-being. How disturbing that our residents are forced to fight for their right to live in serenity in their own homes.

It is difficult to find any measure of altruism in such situations.

The Select Board and the Board of Health have the primary responsibility to oversee the safety and well-being of residents. The Select Board needs to factor in the Board of Health’s judgment and conclusions from the documentation and information it has studied with respect to the effects of turbines on human life and health, even while it evaluates technology, progress, and greening for the town.

The judgment of the BOH in its dedication to the well-being of Dartmouth’s residents should be significantly valued by the Select Board as it continues its decision-making to construct turbines where people stand to be harmed. The Select Board owes this to the residents.

Site location for turbines in Dartmouth should not automatically be dismissed as “Not in My Backyard” – NIMBYism – as some claim.

The most vocal opponents of the Dartmouth turbines, those in the original Chase Road neighborhood site, are not opposed to turbines. They are against having them located improperly in residential areas. It is a matter of preserving the quality of life and health that any person, anywhere, rightfully deserves.

Turbines in Dartmouth are not the issue. Proper location is.

Residents in Dartmouth need to know where these turbines may be located in the future and be prepared if they are sited in their neighborhood, as the town strives to save energy and money.

Beverly Days


Source:  www.southcoasttoday.com 7 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky