LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Who’s really paying for our windfarms? 

Credit:  by Jez Davison, Evening Gazette, www.gazettelive.co.uk 6 September 2011 ~~

A Teesside MP has launched a scathing attack on the promotion of renewable energy by electricity suppliers, labelling it “the biggest scam since timeshare”.

Phil Wilson, the Labour MP for Sedgefield, said customers were being duped by spurious green charges at a time when energy bills were already on the rise.

UK suppliers including British Gas, E.on, Scottish Power and Scottish and Southern have already heaped inflation-busting price rises on cash-strapped homeowners.

Now some utility firms are ramping up costs even further by forcing customers to subsidise costly renewable energy projects.

Mr Wilson said: “E.on are ripping off customers and the Government by increasing our bills and taking massive subsidies.

“We pay 6% of our bills per household to the energy companies in renewable charges – yet we have never been informed about them or asked if we want to opt out.”

He said residents would see their energy bills rocket if the 115 megawatt Isles wind farm near Newton Aycliffe got the go-ahead.

Piloted by utilities giant E.on, the £575m scheme could contain 25 to 45 turbines generating enough electricity to power 53,000 homes.

Last week the proposals were put out for consultation, with a formal planning application expected to be filed by spring next year.

But the scheme has already generated stiff opposition from residents who say they do not want towering turbines blighting the landscape.

But the extra costs they face will be even harder to bear, according to the Renewable Energy Foundation.

The trade body predicts the scheme could rake in £23m a year for E.on – with around half of that cost generated by higher energy bills for customers.

Dr John Constable, director of policy and research at the foundation, said: “People correctly perceive wind farms to be unfair. People think it seems to lack natural justice.”

E.on has pledged to pay up to £460,000 a year into a community benefits fund if the scheme is approved.

The money will be used to upgrade facilities and infrastructure in the area and will run for the lifetime of the scheme – potentially 25 years.

But it’s a fraction of the amount that will be generated via the extra energy levies.

The Renewable Energy Foundation estimates households receiving power from the scheme would pay an extra £235 a year on their bills.

If 53,000 households benefit from the scheme, that will generate a whopping £12.5m a year – roughly the amount the community fund could pay out over the project’s lifetime.

E.on said it was too early to comment on costs because the scope of the scheme had not yet been decided.

The first phase of the consultation runs until October 7.

If the scheme does get the green light, Mr Wilson will not be happy. He says the area already has enough wind turbines to meet its needs.

“We already have 17 in the ward,” he says. “About 22% of our energy needs come from renewable energy.

“I want to attract businesses and people to the area and will more wind turbines not put them off? “

Source:  by Jez Davison, Evening Gazette, www.gazettelive.co.uk 6 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky