LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine location raises important safety concerns 

Credit:  www.salemnews.com 5 September 2011 ~~

As a proponent of green energy, I have to respond to the recent opinions endorsing the proposed wind turbine on Winter Island.

A prudent review process should allow time to consider the pros and cons of any recommendation.Not everyone is in favor of this project and many Salem-area residents need to be informed of the possible hazards.

There are several risks to building a wind turbine in a densely populated area within a public park.

The proposed GE turbine has a tip height of 388 feet, and the rotors are 252 feet wide.According to GE Energy, “ice shedding/ice throw and other hazards can create risk in the vicinity of a wind turbine park.”

Turbine manufacturers recommend that these risks be mitigated by establishing setbacks of 426 feet. In northern climates such as ours, the distance increases because of the high probability of icing at the site, so the ice-throw setback is extended to more than 770 feet.The proposed site on Winter Island does not provide adequate setbacks to ensure public safety.

In the summer, the Winter Island boat launching ramp, playground, and a large portion of Salem Harbor, including boat moorings, are at risk because they fall inside of the recommended setback provisions.Year ’round, the roadways to Winter Island and the surrounding area also face hazards, such as turbine collapse and blade drop, because the proposed wind turbine does not fall within the recommended setback guidelines.

The city officials and designers can’t simply ignore these safety recommendations without assuming all liabilities.All it would take is one lawsuit to negate the forecasted profits, close Winter Island, or force the decommissioning of the wind turbine completely.

This proposed turbine is simply too large for a public park. A large solar array could generate the same electricity without any danger to the public.

I strongly recommend that the City of Salem reconsider its plans to place a wind turbine on Winter Island.

Salem is a thriving city, let’s not ruin the positive improvements by rushing in with a one-size-fits-all energy solution.There are so many better alternatives.

Michael Horton

Salem

Source:  www.salemnews.com 5 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky