LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Fenland towns reject latest wind farm application 

Credit:  BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 24 August 2011 ~~

Whittlesey and Ramsey town councils have voted against the building of more wind turbines near their towns.

There are eight wind farms in the Cambridgeshire Fens, another one is being built and a further two have received planning consent.

“We’re pretty fed-up,” said Martin Curtis, a town, district and county councillor for Whittlesey.

“The more we have them, the less opportunity we’ve got to actually say, ‘No, enough’s enough’.”

He added: “The attitude we’ve taken in the past to say yes was right, but we’ve had enough now.

“Wind turbines are starting to dominate the landscape instead of becoming part of it.”

But John Dupre, a development manager at Wind Prospect Developments, said many people in the area were not opposed to further wind turbines.

“We believe that by using an existing site we can build on the success of the existing wind farm, while at the same time minimising the impact on the surrounding countryside and communities.”

‘Hugely detrimental’

Ramsey and Whittlesey town councils are objecting to a proposal by Wind Prospect Developments to expand the wind farm at Glassmoor Bank, which is between the two towns.

It currently has eight turbines with plans to add six more.

Councillor Ian Walker, from Ramsey Town Council, said: “We felt it was far too big a concentration on what is a very exposed site, and it’s quite close to the villages of Ramsey Mereside and Pondersbridge, both of which are part of the parish.

“We just felt it would have a hugely detrimental affect on the Fenland scene.”

Source:  BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 24 August 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky