| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Three for three
And hats off to the forward thinking planners on the Waitsfield Planning Commission for drawing up new Town Plan language that very specifically protects the town’s high-elevation ridgelines, scenic vistas and prime ag land from wind turbines and solar panels.
Credit: The Valley Reporter, www.valleyreporter.com 18 August 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
This week, this space is being reserved for offering up praise to local people and local events.
Kudos to the Fayston family whose response to thievery was to warn the entire community about the event via email. The Belknap family at the bottom of Tucker Hill Road sounded the electronic alarm the morning after thieves pilfered through one of their vehicles by sending a detailed email to everyone they knew.
That email was forwarded around The Valley so thoroughly that there is probably no one who didn’t get it at least once. Thanks for taking the time and for the warning and for including contact information for the Vermont State Police trooper investigating.
And hats off to the forward thinking planners on the Waitsfield Planning Commission for drawing up new Town Plan language that very specifically protects the town’s high-elevation ridgelines, scenic vistas and prime ag land from wind turbines and solar panels.
Under Vermont law, wind and solar installations that feed into the existing grid are permitted by the Vermont Public Service Board. That board has broad authority in permitting wind and solar installations but must consider unambiguous, clearly stated community standards as articulated in a duly adopted Town Plan.
The planning commission has done just that in prohibiting wind turbines and solar panels above 1,700 feet, on prime ag soils and in scenic vistas. The new standards offer more protection than the current Town Plan, are clear and concise and leave no room for misinterpretation.
The need for alternatives to fossil fuel is great, but so is the need to protect fragile high-elevation ridgelines, the land where we grow our food and the scenic qualities that attract tourists (and many of us) to The Valley.
Finally, the idea of fining repeat offender dog owners for failing to pick up after their pets is a good one. Warren already has such a provision in its dog ordinance and Waitsfield is considering it. Fining repeat owner offenders makes sense, whether the offense be failing to scoop the poop or allowing a dog to roam at large or bark incessantly.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=13026 ]
