Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Virginia Beach won’t buy site for wind data
Credit: By Deirdre Fernandes, The Virginian-Pilot, hamptonroads.com 17 August 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
VIRGINIA BEACH – Spend $50,000 on a wind-energy research study that the governor wants? OK.
Spend $3.3 million to implement the results of that study? No way.
Virginia Beach officials say they have no interest in buying the Chesapeake Light Tower to install equipment that would gather data for the state’s nascent offshore wind industry. The decision came after the city-funded study indicated that it would cost about $2.7 million to upgrade the aging lighthouse off the city’s coast and an additional $550,000 to install a meteorological tower.
“It’s cost-prohibitive to do it,” said Mayor Will Sessoms, who is a proponent of alternative energy industries. “It’s a shame.”
Other federal agencies may still be interested in purchasing the lighthouse, which had been used by the Coast Guard, and the city is providing them good information from the study, Sessoms said.
The city pitched in $50,000 for the study at the urging of Gov. Bob McDonnell.
State officials are trying to develop a wind energy industry. Last year, the General Assembly created the Virginia Offshore Wind Development Authority. The authority, which includes energy company officials, identified the Chesapeake Light Tower as a potential site for collecting weather data and determining whether the state’s coast could support a wind farm. But the authority didn’t have the money to study what improvements the lighthouse structure needed.
The cost of updating the Chesapeake Light Tower is still cheaper than building a new meteorological tower, which is estimated at up to $7 million, according to the study.
The U.S. Department of Energy and other federal agencies are considering the light tower for wind-data research needs, an energy official said.
Jeff Caldwell, a spokesman for McDonnell, said the governor’s office has not had a chance to review the study.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: