LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Think about turbine’s negative effects 

Credit:  Duxbury Clipper, eduxbury.com 10 August 2011 ~~

The negative effects of a wind turbine in Duxbury would impact a much larger area and population than that of its neighbors on Hounds Ditch Lane. While the wind turbine technology to be used has not yet been determined, a size range of between 450kw and 900kw is given in the SED presentation.

To put this in perspective at its smallest size, imagine a 20 story high tower supporting a turbine housing the size of a bus and three rotor blades each ones length being comparable in size to the height of the Myles Standish monument sweeping over an acre of land at a speed of more than 100mph. That is what is being proposed as a 375th anniversary “gift” to our historic town.

We have many concerns about the proposed wind turbine. One that may interest those that cherish our dark rural skies are the Federal Aviation guidelines which state that if the top of the rotor-swept area is more than 199 feet above ground level that lights would be required for aviation safety. Unless otherwise requested by the FAA, only white strobe lights should be used as solid red or pulsating red incandescent lights appear to attract night-migrating birds at a much higher rate than white strobe lights.

Guidelines from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) state that wind towers should not be near wetlands or other known bird or bat concentration areas. We have not yet had the opportunity to plot the coordinates of the favored proposed site No. 1, but we have visited the approximate area on the trails located behind the ninth hole tee box at North Hill and found that the North Hill Marsh Wildlife Sanctuary is but a stone’s throw away.

We are all for “green” energy but don’t feel that this one is the best long term solution for our town.

Laurie McIntosh

John Andrews

Hounds Ditch Lanw

Source:  Duxbury Clipper, eduxbury.com 10 August 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky