[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Palouse Wind named defendant in wind farm case  

Credit:  Aug 9 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Kelli Hadley Moscow-Pullman Daily News, Moscow, Idaho ~~

Over the objection of plaintiff Roger Whitten, a judge Monday added Palouse Wind Energy LLC as a defendant in Whitten’s appeals of two Whitman County rulings allowing a turbine farm in Oakesdale.

The preliminary hearing also resulted in the two appeals being consolidated into one and both examined at the hearing on Sept. 12, said Whitman County Prosecutor Denis Tracy.

Whitten, a long-standing wind farm opponent, has filed two appeals – one against the conditional use permit issued for the project and one against the hearing examiner’s dismissal of his appeal of the county’s findings under the State Environmental Policy Act.

Whitten is an Oakesdale resident whose property will be surrounded by turbines should his appeals be denied. He said his property is threatened by noise pollution, which could harm the health of nearby residents and lower his property’s value, should he choose to sell it.

Tracy said naming Palouse Wind as a respondent was necessary for continuation of the case.

“That is required under the state law, so as a party they will be allowed to make all of their arguments they want to make to the judge,” Tracy said.

In Whitten’s response to Palouse Wind’s request, he wrote, “The Petitioner has named Whitman County as a respondent because it is Whitman County that has rendered illegal executive decisions. Palouse Wind’s close association with Whitman County in the formulation of these decisions does not transfer the responsibility for the land use decisions onto First Wind. … Therefore, it is appropriate for Whitman County to remain the sole Respondent.”

Tracy said the clarification naming Palouse Wind as a respondent doesn’t change anything in the case – it was just a procedural clarification.

“The statute requires that the applicants be a party to the case, so if they weren’t, then the judge would have had to dismiss the case completely,” Tracy said.

If Lincoln County Superior Court Judge John Strohmeier denies Whitten’s appeals, Whitten could appeal to the Washington state Court of Appeals.

Should Whitten win his case, Palouse Wind’s contract to sell power to Avista Utilities would be void, and the wind farm would not be constructed.

Source:  Aug 9 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Kelli Hadley Moscow-Pullman Daily News, Moscow, Idaho

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.