| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Official wants all towns protected; Horn warns about possibility of lawsuits
Credit: BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.co 10 August 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
MORRISON – A Whiteside County Board member is questioning the county’s approach to how far wind turbines should be sited away from towns.
Jim Duffy, D-Sterling, said it sounded like the decision about the required distance between turbines and houses already had been made.
He discussed the issue Tuesday with members of the County Board’s Executive Committee.
The county Public Works Committee recently voted to keep the distance between homes and turbines at 1,400 feet, which is the same as Lee County’s.
But Duffy said the county should allow all towns to regulate turbines within 1.5 miles of their borders. That’s what the board of trustees for Deer Grove, population 48, voted to do in the spring.
That type of regulation is allowed under state law, but some question whether towns without general zoning ordinances can assert such powers. Deer Grove, like most towns its size, doesn’t have zoning rules.
Sterling, Rock Falls, Morrison and Fulton can regulate turbines within 1.5 miles, Duffy noted.
“Why wouldn’t we extend that same courtesy to communities without zoning?” he asked.
County Administrator Joel Horn said the county could, but that he would check with the state’s attorney’s office first. He warned that property owners may sue if the 1.5-mile rule stopped them from having turbines.
Duffy replied that someone could do the same under the current 1,400-foot setback.
Bill McGinn, D-Sterling, chairman of the Public Works Committee, defended the panel’s approach. He argued that wind farms would need special-use permits and that the county could set rules for each one.
After a few minutes of discussion, board Chairman Tony Arduini, D-Rock Falls, moved to another subject.
“There’s no use arguing. We won’t solve it here,” he said.
The Public Works Committee is expected to continue its review of the county’s current ordinance on wind farms. The issue eventually could reach the County Board.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=11802 ]
