[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Official wants all towns protected; Horn warns about possibility of lawsuits  

Credit:  BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.co 10 August 2011 ~~

MORRISON – A Whiteside County Board member is questioning the county’s approach to how far wind turbines should be sited away from towns.

Jim Duffy, D-Sterling, said it sounded like the decision about the required distance between turbines and houses already had been made.

He discussed the issue Tuesday with members of the County Board’s Executive Committee.

The county Public Works Committee recently voted to keep the distance between homes and turbines at 1,400 feet, which is the same as Lee County’s.

But Duffy said the county should allow all towns to regulate turbines within 1.5 miles of their borders. That’s what the board of trustees for Deer Grove, population 48, voted to do in the spring.

That type of regulation is allowed under state law, but some question whether towns without general zoning ordinances can assert such powers. Deer Grove, like most towns its size, doesn’t have zoning rules.

Sterling, Rock Falls, Morrison and Fulton can regulate turbines within 1.5 miles, Duffy noted.

“Why wouldn’t we extend that same courtesy to communities without zoning?” he asked.

County Administrator Joel Horn said the county could, but that he would check with the state’s attorney’s office first. He warned that property owners may sue if the 1.5-mile rule stopped them from having turbines.

Duffy replied that someone could do the same under the current 1,400-foot setback.

Bill McGinn, D-Sterling, chairman of the Public Works Committee, defended the panel’s approach. He argued that wind farms would need special-use permits and that the county could set rules for each one.

After a few minutes of discussion, board Chairman Tony Arduini, D-Rock Falls, moved to another subject.

“There’s no use arguing. We won’t solve it here,” he said.

The Public Works Committee is expected to continue its review of the county’s current ordinance on wind farms. The issue eventually could reach the County Board.

Source:  BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.co 10 August 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.