[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

New twist in Hempnall wind turbine saga 

Credit:  By Adam Gretton, Eastern Daily Press, www.edp24.co.uk 10 August 2011 ~~

A long-running battle over a proposed wind farm took a new twist after it emerged that a different renewable energy firm was looking to develop a south Norfolk site.

Plans for seven large turbines at Hempnall were rejected by a planning inspector two years ago following an application, which was unanimously refused by district councillors.

However, a scaled-down project could soon be on the table under a different developer after it emerged that Oxford-based TCI Renewables was looking to buy the site off Bussey’s Loke from Enertrag.

German-owned Enertrag, which recently closed its regional office in Diss, announced in March that it was reviewing its local operations after failing to get an onshore wind scheme approved in south Norfolk.

Turbine objectors in Hempnall are preparing for a fresh battle after being told that TCI Renewables was looking to take on the project.

It comes after Enertrag held a consultation event in the village in January for the Streetwood Wind Farm, but have yet to submit a planning application for the four 126m-high turbines, which they claimed would generate enough renewable energy to power 4,413 homes.

Michael Windridge, local district councillor, said he was told by Bruce Hutt, head of UK operations at TCI Renewables, on Friday that the company was interested in the Hempnall site.

“The reason they [Enertrag] are pulling out is that they can not earn the support of the local community and it is really disappointing that TCI Renewables do not understand that. They are as misguided as Enertrag were in failing to understand the attachment local people have to the landscape and local environment,” he said.

Christopher Small, a director for Enertrag, said the company was in negotiations about signing over some of its projects, including the Streetwood scheme at Hempnall.

“As a company we investigate a lot of potential sites, but sometimes the political and local community do not think it is a good idea and sometimes we have to bow down. The situation at Hempnall is very open. I just hope the political landscape will change in East Anglia and would enable the county and community to meet their renewable energy targets,” he said.

Enertrag plans for three turbines at Tivetshall St Mary are currently awaiting determination at South Norfolk Council.

Officials at TCI Renewables declined to comment. The company also lodged an appeal against the refusal of three 126m-high turbines at the former Pulham airfield in south Norfolk, which was the subject of an inquiry in June. A planning inspector has yet to make a ruling.

Geoff Moulton, chairman of Hempnall Parish Council and the SHOWT (Stop Hempnall’s Onshore Wind Turbines) chairman, added: “The people of Hempnall and surrounding villages have been absolutely against the concept of onshore turbines for probably five years now. It is no coincidence that they [Enertrag] have decided to pull out of East Anglia after the last consultation exercise went down like a lead balloon. We have been in hibernation mode, but as soon as a further application is made we will be back to the war zone.”

Source:  By Adam Gretton, Eastern Daily Press, www.edp24.co.uk 10 August 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky