[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Eagles and turbines: Environmental goals at odds near Red Wing 

Credit:  StarTribune, www.startribune.co 28 July 2011 ~~

This past spring, the Raptor Resource Group in Decorah, Iowa, placed a camera near an eagle’s nest. I was able to see the male and female tend to their nest and watch as the eggs hatched and as the eaglets grew up and eventually flew. It was a thrilling experience.

When I was a child growing up in the 1960s and ’70s, it was a rare and exciting event to spot an eagle, because their numbers were so low (due to DDT and reproductive failure).

So I was very disappointed to read that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission had voted to move a wind project forward in Red Wing despite warnings from federal wildlife officials that the blades could kill the eagles (“Bald eagles could thwart a wind farm,”July 24).

The Mississippi River between Red Wing and Wabasha is the nesting grounds and winter home for bald and golden eagles. The National Eagle Center in Wabasha counted more than 400 eagles living there last December.

Some of these eagles travel from as far away as Alaska, covering many miles per day. Can we assume that they will simply fly around the wind farm?

According to the National Eagle Center in Wabasha, “only about 50% of first-year birds live. Studies have shown that only one in ten eagles make it to five years of age.

They face electrocution from high voltage wires, pesticides, lead poisoning from bullets ingested from dead prey, fishing lines and rodent poisons.” Will we have to add turbine blades to this list?

I hope the PUC will rethink its decision. Wind power has its place, but Red Wing has too many eagles to lose.


Source:  StarTribune, www.startribune.co 28 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky