[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine stays in Libertyville  

Credit:  By Abby Scalf, Libertyville Patch, libertyville.patch.com 21 July 2011 ~~

A Lake County court has denied residents’ request for Aldridge Electric Co. to remove its wind turbine within Libertyville.

Judge Mitchell Hoffman said Thursday that while the court found the village of Libertyville violated its wind farm statute, the residents did not provide significant evidence nor did they act on their objections in a timely manner.

“The question whether Aldridge detrimentally relied on the village and on the silence of plaintiffs throughout the hearing, approval and construction process is an issue which must be resolved at trial,” Judge Hoffman said.

The legal battle began in 2009 between the village and the Citizens for the Protection of Libertyville when Aldridge Electric Inc. installed the wind turbine on its property at 844 E. Rockland Road. The lawsuit alleged the village did not notify residents between a plan commission meeting in 2008 and board meeting in 2009 when the board unanimously agreed to allow Aldridge to build the wind turbine.

“He clearly spent a lot of time to make a well-thought-out decision, but clearly we are disappointed,” said David Gates, who belongs to Citizens for the Protection of Libertyville.

Residents willing to negotiate

Gates said they still are willing to negotiate with the village and Aldridge Electric. He said an agreement was made July 27 by Aldridge to move the wind turbine 800 feet away, which the village agreed to, but the company backed out.

“The village has spent way too much as we have way too much time and money on this issue that we could have mediated a long time ago,” Gates said.

While Aldridge has said he is willing to meet with residents to resolve the dispute, Gates said Aldridge has told the residents only what he would be willing to do. That is not mediation.

“He would have been happy to sit and tell us what he is happy to do,” he said.

Resident Gary Newell said both sides have spent close to $200,000 in legal fees to address the issue, when the village could have spent $50,000 to have it moved and settled the matter years ago. He said the wind turbine is a nuisance and is causing an unnecessary rift between the village and the residents.

“I’m really disappointed the town has protected a nuisance and not protected its citizens here,” Newell said.

Nuisance objection trial begins August

The residents will begin trial in three weeks to address the nuisance objection that also was also filed when the turbine was first installed although residents agree they want to negotiate about moving the turbine.

“We were hoping this would come to a conclusion here. We wanted a conclusion today. I don’t understand why we are moving this thing forward when everybody agrees there is no real gain for anyone here,” Newell said. “It is not producing any electricity. It is harming the residents. It is giving the town a bad name. There is no winning here.”

Gates said while the judge could not take it into consideration in this setting, they will show evidence at trial they were tricked. He said the judge pointed out they did not rush to raise our concerns in a timely manner.

“We didn’t know we needed to. We didn’t understand what they had done to us. We didn’t understand until it was up and making noise that we had been tricked,” Gates said.

Donna Gates said the good news is villages will take a conservative approach as to allowing wind turbines to prevent a similar occurrence.

“The good news is hopefully we will not see this happen again,” Dave Gates said.

Source:  By Abby Scalf, Libertyville Patch, libertyville.patch.com 21 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.