Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Judge rules Libertyville wind turbine case will go to trial
Credit: By Beth Kramer, Lake County News-Sun, newssun.suntimes.com 21 July 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Nancy Zeivel said she was both upset and disappointed with Lake County Associate Judge Mitchell Hoffman’s ruling Thursday the legality of a wind turbine in her back yard will be determined at trial.
Zeivel, who is legally blind, is one of six plaintiffs who formed a Citizens for the Protection of Libertyville in response to the wind turbine that was erected near residential property lines. The plaintiffs allege the turbine’s loud noise causes loss of sleep and distraction.
Through attorney Richard Porter, the Copeland Manor neighborhood residents asked the judge to void Libertyville’s ordinances that allowed a wind turbine to be built within 250 feet of property lines.
“Because I’m blind, I depend on my hearing. This has interfered with my hearing. I like the (wind turbine) description of sounding like a car, because it’s loud … I can’t hear what I need to hear,” Zeivel said.
Hoffman did not void the ordinances or order that the wind turbine be moved. Citing a factual issue, the judge ruled the matter must go to trial.
“The judge denied (our) motion. His decision was well thought out,” said David Gates, spokesman for Citizens for the Protection of Libertyville. “We would like to avoid trial. We’ve been trying for negotiation from day one.”
Porter said Aldridge Electric, which constructed the turbine, had agreed to move the turbine until discovering it would cost $75,000.
The judge previously granted an injunction that allowed the wind turbine to be operated from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Even so, Zeivel and the other plaintiffs allege it impedes their daily lives.
“I just thought it would be over by now,” she said.
Instead of resolution, Porter said he is preparing to take the case to trial. He also represents the group in its nuisance action lawsuit against the turbine.
The matter will be up again in court Aug. 16.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Paypal) |
(via Stripe) |
Share: