[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Hammond wind hearing tonight  

Credit:  By MATT MCALLISTER, The Journal, www.ogd.com 19 July 2011 ~~

HAMMOND – Just over a year after the confrontational end of the last public hearing on its local wind energy law, the Hammond Town Council will hear public sentiment once again at today’s hearing, scheduled for 7 p.m. in the gymnasium at Hammond Central School, 51 South Main St.

“Local residents can speak on the law,” said town Supervisor Ronald W. Bertram of the evening’s format, “but I don’t think the hearing is the place to rehash several years of opinion.” Mr. Bertram said that citizens may speak aloud or provide written comments to the town council. “Depending on the volume,” of letters, he added, written submissions may or may not be read aloud. Comments can also be made on the town’s website, www.townofhammondny.com, according to the supervisor.

The most recent public hearing, which was held on June 29, 2010, for the purpose of setting the current one-year moratorium, came to a climactic finale when Robert G. and Kent Hollister, husband and son, respectively, of Janie G. Hollister, supervisor before Mr. Bertram, exited the gymnasium while shouting obscenities and making threatening gestures towards other members of the community.

Robert Hollister was one of only three speakers, out of approximately 25, who commented in opposition of the moratorium at the 2010 hearing. Nearly 100 locals attended.

The saga has been ongoing in the small, St. Lawrence River-bordering town for years, with membership of two different town boards, two separate wind committees, and members of the public drawing clear and personal lines in the sand as the issues have been researched and debated. Iberdrola

Renewables had submitted and later rescinded an application to the town which proposed 50 to 75 turbines across Hammond, Morristown and the town of Oswegatchie.

Hammond’s Wind Energy Facilities Law of 2009 has been adopted on two occasions, fought over in court, and is currently under moratorium until the end of July.

To add to the fray, new rules giving committees in Albany decision-making power on siting power projects at or above 25 megawatts – as the Stone Church Wind Farm originally was – the American Energy Act of 2011 (formerly Article X), was passed June 23 by the state Senate and Assembly.

The law enables a streamlined, one-year permitting process for building power plants. Those with an interest in the project would have access to a pot of money from the developer, called the intervenor fund. Each project would be considered by a siting board that would include locally appointed community representatives. State agencies would be responsible to check for environmental harm and benefits.

It also includes a grandfather provision for those projects already in consideration at a local level to avoid the process.

Paul C. Copleman, Iberdrola communications manager, responding to questions requested via email, said his company “does not currently have an application with the Town of Hammond for a project.” He was reserved when it came to questions regarding the American Energy Act.

“Once (Article X) rules have been established,” Mr. Copleman wrote, “we will evaluate the project and (Article X’s) impacts at that time. We will also consider the local zoning rules once those are passed. It makes sense for us to explore all of our project development options, but any push forward will involve working closely with the community.”

The current hiatus in activity, he said, though delaying some aspects of development, has allowed Iberdrola to “collect wind data and complete some environmental studies.”

Mr. Bertram, meanwhile, said its business as usual, despite the state’s recent decision.

“I don’t think its affecting us right now,” he said of the legislation. “We are certainly not ignoring the law, but based on advice from our attorney (Joseph W. Russell, of Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece), we are proceeding as we would have without it.”

Mr. Bertram, however, said that while he is a “strong proponent of Home Rule,” he agreed with some of the language within the American Energy Act of 2011.

“We’re not talking about building a supermarket here,” the supervisor said. “There isn’t a whole lot of local expertise,” when it comes to wind farms, he said, adding, “I’ve found the entire process to be mind boggling. We had a committee of ten studying the issues for nearly a year and we’re still learning something new every day.”

Source:  By MATT MCALLISTER, The Journal, www.ogd.com 19 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.