LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Follow the money 

Credit:  The Orleans Record, orleanscountyrecord.com 15 July 2011 ~~

Mary Powell, the CEO of Green Mountain Power (GMP), Dave Halquist, the CEO of Vermont Electric Cooperative and the Public Service Board characterize the Kingdom Community Wind Project as “cost-effective.” All imply that it is a good buy for Vermont.

Is the project a good buy for electricity? Citizens will pay an estimated $188 million more than market prices over the next 25 years for electricity from this project. So it is not “cost-effective” electricity.

Is the project a good buy for reducing CO2 emissions? Vermonters will pay $100 to avoid a metric ton of CO2 emissions with this project. Under the Renewable Portfolio Standards policy that 29 states use, CO2 emissions can be reduced for $13 – $25 a ton. So it is not a “cost-effective” way to reduce CO2 emissions, and it destroys an irreplaceable natural resource.

So if Vermont citizens are not getting a good buy, who is? The big money winner is Gaz Metro who expects a 9 percent return on their investment – a much better rate than you can get at a bank.

By voting “NO” on the VEC transmission upgrade, VEC members can help save Vermont from this project and potentially from similar projects.

You can find documentation for these facts and learn more at whyvoteno.com.

Sincerely,

Ron Holland, VEC member

Irasburg, Vt.

Source:  The Orleans Record, orleanscountyrecord.com 15 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky