LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Fresh call for windfarm fight 

Credit:  Filey & Hunmanby Mercury, www.fileymercury.co.uk 14 July 2011 ~~

Campaigners against a controversial wind farm near Hunmanby have intensified their fight against the proposal.

The No To Wolds Wind Farm Group have stepped up their battle to stop Banks Renewables building a test mast on the outskirts of Hunmanby.

The contentious 80m monitoring mast is currently subject to a planning wrangle between Scarborough Council chiefs and Banks after an original application for the mast was thrown out in April.

However, the company – which hopes to build up to 14 turbines in the South Dale area – have appealed against the decision, which if overturned, could pave the way for the erection of the mast this year.

A deadline of July 20 was set for campaigners to put forward their arguments both for and against on the case, with members of the No To Wolds Wind Farm Group appealing for residents to contact the Planning Inspectorate about the controversial matter.

Julia Hey, spokeswoman for the group, said: “This is another opportunity to send a strong response from Hunmanby, Burton Fleming and surrounding areas.

“It is vitally important that the letters focus on the mast and do not refer to the proposed wind farm development.

“The mast would be the tallest structure in the area and will be viewed as an alien and incongruous feature within the pre-historic Wolds landscape.”

The original refusal for the mast was greeted with delight by protesters who marched upon Scarborough Town Hall to object the plans.

However, Phil Dyke, development director for Banks Renewables, said the company believed the mast would cause little aesthetical impact.

He added: “We were disappointed that Scarborough Council’s planning committee members rejected our wind mast planning application, especially given that it was recommended for approval by the council’s officers.

“The test mast is an unobtrusive, temporary structure that would be sited in an entirely suitable location and we hope this will be recognised.”

Source:  Filey & Hunmanby Mercury, www.fileymercury.co.uk 14 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky