[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Fresh call for windfarm fight  

Credit:  Filey & Hunmanby Mercury, www.fileymercury.co.uk 14 July 2011 ~~

Campaigners against a controversial wind farm near Hunmanby have intensified their fight against the proposal.

The No To Wolds Wind Farm Group have stepped up their battle to stop Banks Renewables building a test mast on the outskirts of Hunmanby.

The contentious 80m monitoring mast is currently subject to a planning wrangle between Scarborough Council chiefs and Banks after an original application for the mast was thrown out in April.

However, the company – which hopes to build up to 14 turbines in the South Dale area – have appealed against the decision, which if overturned, could pave the way for the erection of the mast this year.

A deadline of July 20 was set for campaigners to put forward their arguments both for and against on the case, with members of the No To Wolds Wind Farm Group appealing for residents to contact the Planning Inspectorate about the controversial matter.

Julia Hey, spokeswoman for the group, said: “This is another opportunity to send a strong response from Hunmanby, Burton Fleming and surrounding areas.

“It is vitally important that the letters focus on the mast and do not refer to the proposed wind farm development.

“The mast would be the tallest structure in the area and will be viewed as an alien and incongruous feature within the pre-historic Wolds landscape.”

The original refusal for the mast was greeted with delight by protesters who marched upon Scarborough Town Hall to object the plans.

However, Phil Dyke, development director for Banks Renewables, said the company believed the mast would cause little aesthetical impact.

He added: “We were disappointed that Scarborough Council’s planning committee members rejected our wind mast planning application, especially given that it was recommended for approval by the council’s officers.

“The test mast is an unobtrusive, temporary structure that would be sited in an entirely suitable location and we hope this will be recognised.”

Source:  Filey & Hunmanby Mercury, www.fileymercury.co.uk 14 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.