[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Lincolnshire wind farm couple’s complaints challenged  

Credit:  BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 12 July 2011 ~~

A couple seeking £2.5m compensation for wind farm noise have been accused of making “exaggerated” claims.

Jane and Julian Davis from Deeping St Nicholas, Lincolnshire, have said the constant hum from the eight turbines forced them to move house.

London’s High Court heard the defence argue the owners and operators had done everything possible to deal with the couple’s concerns.

It was also suggested their sensitivity was “never reasonably foreseeable”.

The couple earlier told the court they were forced out of their home in 2007 after failing to find a way of blocking out the noise.

Noise injunction

Defence QC William Norris, suggested the couple’s accounts of unsettling noise from the turbines had been “exaggerated, inconsistent and unreasonable”.

He added: “Whether their reaction has been that of reasonable wind farm neighbours is an issue in the case – given that the wind farm is compliant with the noise conditions imposed by its planning permission, and given the scientific evidence.”

He also told the court it was “never reasonably foreseeable” that the couple would be “adversely affected” by the sound of the turbines.

He insisted his clients had done everything possible to “seek to address their concerns about the adverse impact”.

Mr and Mrs Davis are suing local landowners – RC Tinsley Ltd and Nicholas Watts – on whose land some of the turbines are sited, as well as Fenland Windfarms Ltd and Fenland Green Power Cooperative Ltd, who own and operate them.

They are seeking a permanent injunction to halt the noise, or damages of up to £2.5m for the disruption of their lives.

The case is being viewed as a test on the law relating to noise nuisance from wind turbines.

The hearing continues.

Source:  BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 12 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.