LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Regretting wind turbines 

Credit:  Rutland Herald, Published July 5, 2011 via Energize Vermont, energizevermont.org 7 July 2011 ~~

Last summer, I got married to a lifelong resident of Westfield and moved to the Northeast Kingdom from Somerset County, Pennsylvania, where I grew up. Somerset County and Orleans County are similar in many ways – rural, mountainous, and recently, the proving ground for industrial-scale wind projects.

The first wind turbines were minor tourist attractions: motorists flattened nearby hay fields to get a better look. A few years later the second “wind farm” went in, and a few months after that, the third and fourth. Suddenly, everyone began to take notice. Landowners who had leased property for the turbines began to have regrets. Longtime friends who leased their best field for the construction of two turbines pull their curtains closed and shut their windows to avoid reminders of this decision, which has been so distressing for their family. Given the choice again, would they sign over their land? Definitely not.

These days, people see wind turbines as what they are: money makers for big corporations, at a cost to the environment. Wind turbines are not the only option, and my experience has shown that they are certainly not the best. That’s why my household will cast a no vote for upgrading the transmission line that would support Green Mountain Power’s proposal for turbines on the Lowell Mountains. A few extra cents on the electric bill is not much to trade for the cultural, environmental, and economic value of an unindustrialized landscape.

CARRIE YOUNG

Westfield

Source:  Rutland Herald, Published July 5, 2011 via Energize Vermont, energizevermont.org 7 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky