Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Please note that opinion pieces (including letters, editorials, and blogs), reflect the viewpoints of their authors; National Wind Watch does not necessarily agree with them in their entirety or endorse them in any way.
Co-op members can vote no
Credit: Rutland Herald, Published July 5, 2011, via Energize Vermont, energizevermont.org ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Vermont Electric Cooperative members will soon have a rare opportunity to make an important statement about what really matters. Green Mountain Power wants to erect 21 450-foot-tall turbines along the ridgeline of the Lowell Mountains. (Though GMP has been issued a certificate of public good for the project, there are 42 conditions on the permit that must be met or the project doesn’t go forward.)
If they were to proceed, GMP would need to blast away more than three miles of the ridgeline’s 450 million-year-old profile to install the turbines. They would build seven miles of road. This activity would fragment a 29,000-acre block of back country that has been identified as “at risk” to ensure sufficient connectivity for wildlife in the New York-Vermont-eastern-Quebec region. The project would displace wildlife, changing their daily and historic migratory patterns. It would reorder the summit hydrology which now provides clean water to everything down slope including the village of Albany and homes and businesses along Routes 14 to the east and 100 to the west. Clear-cutting for the roadways and turbines will expose thin soils to instant erosion and potential damage to down slope water resources.
So what does this have to do with VEC members? You get to vote on whether to upgrade the Lowell-to-Jay VEC transmission line earlier than scheduled so it can support this project and move power from the ridgeline to the grid. VEC rates are going to go up with or without this project. Without it, VEC members can make decisions about their power future that won’t put a greater cost burden on certain co-op members and member towns, especially Albany, as will happen with this project.
A no vote could save VEC ratepayers money in the long term and is fairer to all members. Until we have scavenged every possible kilowatt through efficiency, we have no right to disturb the mountains and undo their contribution to our economic and environmental well-being. The first rule of effective climate change action is to protect intact and functioning ecosystems.
STEVE WRIGHT
Craftsbury
The writer is a former state commissioner of fish and wildlife.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
![]() (via Stripe) |
![]() (via Paypal) |
Share: