[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farms may get a thump 

Credit:  Ben Webster, Manawatu Standard, 6 July 2011 ~~

The future of dozens of wind farms is at stake in a case opening in the High Court in Britain today in which a couple say that the noise from turbines forced them to abandon their home.

Julian and Jane Davis say that the noise from the 100-metre turbines just over a kilometre from their farmhouse was so disturbing that they were unable to sleep at night, even with their double-glazed windows closed and when wearing earplugs. In documents submitted to the High Court, they liken the swishing and low-frequency humming of the blades to the sound of a helicopter.

They moved out of the house in Deeping St Nicholas, Lincolnshire, in December 2006, six months after the eight-turbine wind farm began operating. The case is being watched closely by hundreds of other families who say that wind farms cause disturbance. If the couple win, operators of up to 50 wind farms across the country may have to compensate residents or stop their turbines. The case could affect plans to build thousands more to meet Britain’s renewable energy target.

The case will focus on ‘‘amplitude modulation’’, sometimes referred to as the swishing or thumping noise made by the blades. The industry admits that it is not properly understood. RenewableUK, the industry’s trade body, has commissioned a study of the problem. Jane Davis, 55,

Dozens of wind farms across Britain are in jeopardy over a possible legal decision. a former nurse, said: ‘‘I can sleep next to major roads and railway stations but the particular noise character from the turbines stops you going to sleep or wakes you up. It makes a ‘whoom whoom whoom’ which becomes unbearable.

‘‘We would like the industry and government to recognise that some wind farms have unexpected adverse effects. They should also realise that when people complain that they can’t sleep, they are not being nimbys, but have a problem.

‘‘I am not against wind farms. I just want to be able to sleep in my own home.’’ She said the problem could be caused by the local geography and spacing between turbines.

The couple bringing the legal action say that the problem could be resolved by removing two of the turbines and limiting the hours of operation of a third. Alternatively, they want the owners, which include the energy company EDF and a co-operative, to pay them about £400,000 (NZ$775,000) for their extra housing costs to date and to buy an equivalent home elsewhere.

The couple face ruin if they lose. While their household and business insurer is covering their legal costs, they could be held liable for some of the defendants’ costs, which the couple estimate to be more than £2 million. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs acknowledged there could be a particular problem with the type of noise from wind farms. It said: ‘‘There is research . . . which suggests that elements of the nature and character of some of the sounds emitted may aggravate the impact.’’

RenewableUK said: ‘‘We are looking to see whether, in certain rare circumstances, there may be a problem and if that’s shown to be the case clearly we would have to deal with that.’’

Source:  Ben Webster, Manawatu Standard, 6 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky