[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Appeal over Gloucestershire wind turbine plan  

Credit:  The Citizen, www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk 6 July 2011 ~~

Green energy pioneers haven’t given up on a wind farm plan in the Vale of Berkeley.

Stroud-based firm Ecotricity is appealing Stroud District Council’s decision to refuse planning permission for a wind park at Stinchcombe.

It says the four 120 metre-high turbines would provide green energy for more than 7,000 homes.

But critics say they will be a blot on the landscape.

Ecotricity boss Dale Vince, said: “This was always a decision that didn’t make any sense to us. Britain doesn’t have the luxury of turning down projects like this just because a tiny minority of people don’t like the look of them.

“We Britons need to harness our indigenous clean energy sources, like the wind. Our appeal just wastes time and money, ours and the council’s, getting the right decision – the one the council planning department actually recommended.”

Landscape

The council’s development control committee turned down the plans in April, due to its impact on the landscape. That was against council planning officers’ advice.

Ecotricity says its location, between the M5, A38 and Gloucester-Bristol railway line means four turbines would not adversely affect the landscape enough to warrant not building them. It also says the wind farm would be “more than 1km away from the Cotswold AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty)”. However, Campaigners from Save Berkeley Vale, and the Cotswold Conservation Board said that was too close.

Development control committee member Councillor Graham Travé (Con, Coaley and Uley), said an appeal was “ridiculous”.

“It’s another round of wasting public money,” said Coun Travé, who spoke out against when the original plans for eight turbines were revealed in September 2009.

“It’s simply the wrong place for the wind turbines. This will be a waste of another £250,000 – it’s just ridiculous.”

SBV chairman Jack Sant said: “Our main concern is that our planning consultant’s view is that it is the most inappropriate place for a wind park he has ever seen.”

Source:  The Citizen, www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk 6 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: