[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Lincolnshire couple in landmark court case over turbine noise  

Credit:  BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 4 July 2011 ~~

A couple who claim they were driven out of their Lincolnshire farm by the hum of wind turbines have started a High Court bid for £2.5m compensation.

Jane and Julian Davis moved from Grays Farm in Deeping St Nicholas because of what they said was the strain of living with the incessant noise.

The case will test the law on whether sound created by turbines amounts to a noise nuisance.

Mrs Davis said it was a “nightmare” and they had no option but to leave.

Speaking before the hearing, she said: “The noise is unpredictable and mainly occurs at night, you can never get to bed with the assurance that you will stay asleep.

“You can’t even have a barbecue,” she said.

‘Shut down turbines’

The couple are suing local landowners – RC Tinsley Ltd and Nicholas Watts, on whose land some of the turbines have been sited – as well as Fenland Windfarms Ltd and Fenland Green Power Cooperative Ltd, which own and operate the turbines.

Their lawyers are seeking either a permanent injunction to shut down the turbines or damages of up to £2.5m to compensate for the disruptive effects on their lives.

They have not returned to their home since 2007, and are now living in Spalding.

Mrs Davis said before the hearing she had no quarrel with the appearance of the turbines – only with the noise.

“We want them to stop the noise so we can move back in,” she said.

The couple’s QC, Peter Harrison, said the case was not a test of the government’s green policies, but concerned the Davis’ wish to “get on with their lives and get back into their house”.

The case will hinge on technical arguments about measuring the amplitude modulation given off by the turbines.

The hearing before Mr Justice Hickinbottom continues.

Source:  BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 4 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.