LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Controversial wind turbine gets go ahead 

Credit:  www.eastwoodadvertiser.co.uk 30 June 2011 ~~

A controversial plan to build a 430ft wind turbine less than a mile from hundreds of homes in Broxtowe has been given the go ahead.

Councillors narrowly voted in favour of Severn Trent’s plan this week, despite nearly 90 per cent of nearby residents objecting to the plan.

The turbine is set to be built in the Erewash Valley, 750m from houses in Awsworth and 765m from Giltbrook, which residents with fears over their health, TV interference and ‘visual pollution’, argued was too near.

Paul Howard, representing the residents, said: “This application is all about money and shareholders and little to do with renewable energy.”

Of the 321 letters sent to residents, 282 objected and just 17 approved.

The turbine, which will generate power for Severn Trent’s sewage works at Halls Lane, Giltbrook, will tower above the grade-II listed Bennerley viaduct.

Broxtowe borough councillor for the ward Mick Brown called it a ‘rape of the countryside’. He said: “Once they have got their foot in the door the Erewash Valley will be awash with these.”

But renewable energy manager from Severn Trent Martin Dent argued that the turbine will keep the firm’s prices the lowest in the UK for customers.

“This is a good development for the area and will help safeguard the interests of our customers,” he said.

Following a visit to turbines near Mansfield, councillors on the planning committee were divided.

Cllr Brian Wombwell said: “Regarding the view, any view is subjective. If we don’t put this in greenbelt, where on Earth are we going to put it? The objections will be raised anywhere.”

But Cllr Craig Cox claimed the carbon used to construct the turbine would never be offset by the small amount it generates. He added: “With 88 per cent of residents opposing this, we would be doing those people an injustice.”

Cllr Lydia Ball also raised concerns about ‘shadow flicker’, when the sun casts long flickering shadows from behind the turbine onto people’s homes, which could trigger fits in people with epilepsy.

After a long debate, the committee voted five in favour and five against, with chairman Cllr Steve Barber having the casting ‘yes’ vote.

The decision will be passed on to the Government as it requires special permission to be built in greenbelt.

Source:  www.eastwoodadvertiser.co.uk 30 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky