Please take a minute to help keep us online.
To preserve our independence, we are not funded by any political or industry groups, and we do not host ads. Wind Watch relies entirely on user donations, every penny of which goes directly to keeping the web site running.
Stripe: |
PayPal/Venmo: |
High cost of wind farms
Credit: Northern Argus, www.northernargus.com.au 29 June 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
In his letter to the Northern Argus (June 22), Scott Thomas talks about the money injected into local communities by AGL through its wind turbine developments in the Mid North. My question is: will this money cover the cost of the destruction to the environment, the loss of birds and bats, the loss of our Mid North vistas, people being forced to leave their homes because of noise and other issues, divisions in local communities, increased risk of fire, the ill health that turbines are causing, reduction in land values and disruption to telecommunications?
All this and we still don’t have clear evidence that wind turbines are reducing green house gas emissions. What we do know is that they are destroying our rural landscapes and inflicting us with a host of other problems.
LIZ TRAEGER, YACKA,
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: