[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

A national challenge  

Credit:  By Carlos Harrison | From Preservation | July/August 2011 www.nationaltrust.org ~~

Though the renewable energy plants on BLM’s pending applications list are in the West, the tension between preservation and energy generation is national in scope.

Rick Webb, a senior scientist in the Department of Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia, has been fighting a proposed wind installation in the Allegheny Mountains for seven years. Highland New Wind Development is moving forward with plans to place turbines on the privately owned Tamarack Ridge along the border between Virginia and West Virginia. The ridge overlooks the battlefield at Camp Allegheny, where advancing Union forces clashed with wintering Confederate troops intent on defending a crucial mountain pass.

“If you go to this battlefield—the highest elevation Civil War battlefield in the eastern United States, and probably the most pristine—it’s like stepping back in time,” Webb says. “But Highland New Wind Development’s 400-foot turbines would … dominate the view in the area where the primary engagement of forces occurred.” Webb says the fight is complicated because the site is privately held, so it doesn’t require the same kind of federal approvals that would be needed for an industrial wind installation on public land. Moreover, the development site is in Virginia, but the battlefield sits across the border in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, in a sparsely populated corner of the state.

“It’s hard for me to describe the beauty and significance of the panorama here,” Webb concludes. “Hundreds of soldiers lost their lives on this battlefield. While I understand the imperative of energy independence, I also believe there are places where the benefits [of power generation] are not worth the trade-off, and this is one of those places.” Webb says that this fight is likely to rage on for quite some time but that environmental concerns may dovetail with preservation goals to protect the landscape. He points to the group of citizens poised to sue to protect endangered species in the area if the project moves forward: They may succeed in preserving the landscape near the camp.

Source:  By Carlos Harrison | From Preservation | July/August 2011 www.nationaltrust.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.