LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Take a global approach to Cape wind projects 

Credit:  www.barnstablepatriot.com 24 June 2011 ~~

The June 6 Falmouth selectmen’s meeting missed the major wind turbine irritant. The HMMH consultants highlighted their A-weighted sound study and Steven Clark, Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, said Falmouth’s approach was “right in line” with the administration’s policy. Both represent a waste of Falmouth time and money if NASA’s Technical Paper to the U.S. Department of Energy Wind – HydroOcean Technologies Division (1990) carries weight.

A-weighted sound pressure levels de-emphasizes lower frequencies in evaluating the effects of noise. The more appropriate measure, dB(G), specifically emphasizes lower frequency evaluation (MassDEP, are you listening?). The effect of a turbine wake may take 16 rotor diameters for recovery to the initial free-air flow (Wind Turbine Wakes Control and Vortex Shedding [2004]. This represents a 4304’ around Falmouth’s utility sized turbines since each individual machine is an omnidirectional source.

The Environmental Protection Agency in Denmark has developed criteria for low frequency and infrasound (not just for wind turbines) of 85 dB(G), explicitly allowing a 10 dB factor for people more sensitive than the norm. Maybe it’s time Falmouth (let alone county and state) follow Denmark’s lead and ask questions addressing the more accurate problem!

Mark Cool

West Falmouth

Source:  www.barnstablepatriot.com 24 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky