[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

US FERC grants BPA extension to respond to Northwest oversupply complaint  

Credit:  Hilary Costa, Platts, www.platts.com 21 June 2011 ~~

The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Monday granted Bonneville Power Administration’s request for an extension to the comment period on a complaint Northwest wind generators brought against it.

FERC agreed with BPA that the comment period can end July 19, instead of July 5 as originally proposed, giving BPA two additional weeks to respond to the complaint.

In its motion, BPA had said that the large number of legal and factual issues raised in the complaint merited a longer response period.

Iberdrola Renewables, PacifiCorp, NextEra Energy Resources, Invenergy Wind North America and Horizon Wind Energy filed the complaint, which argues that BPA is discriminating against certain generators in violation of the Federal Power Act–including Section 211A–with its environmental redispatch curtailment practice.

The complaint also says BPA is disrupting existing interconnection contracts and that the federal power agency should file a transmission tariff for FERC approval within months.

Since May 18, BPA has invoked environmental redispatch to manage an oversupply of power, curtailing thermal and wind generation and replacing it with excess federal hydropower. BPA provides the replacement power at $0/MWh, but will not sell it at negative prices–where sellers pay buyers to take the power they are producing.

Wind interests have protested the policy, as they stand to lose production tax credits and renewable energy certificates worth as much as $50/MWh when they are curtailed.

Several stakeholders, including the Grant Public Utility District, the Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative, the Western Public Agencies Group and Puget Sound Energy, also filed motions on Monday to intervene in the proceeding.

Source:  Hilary Costa, Platts, www.platts.com 21 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.