[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind opponents worry about legislation  

Credit:  By Peter Payette, Interlochen Public Radio, ipr.interlochen.org 20 June 2011 ~~

Last year the Michigan Supreme Court said townships can restrict where gravel pits are dug. Now some legislators are moving to take that zoning power away. Critics say they might do more than that. They warn it could also make it easier for energy companies to build large windmills.

Backlash over gravel pits
In Michigan, most rules about how land can be used are local, decided by cities and townships. Some land uses, like farming and drilling for oil and gas, cannot be restricted by local governments, at least not very much. Whether local planners should be allowed to restrict sand and gravel mining has been argued twice in front of the Michigan Supreme Court in the last three decades. In the more recent case the state’s highest court told Kasson Township in Leelanau County it was reasonable to limit where gravel pits are dug. That meant a woman just on the edge of the gravel district could not mine her property.

Now a bill moving through the Michigan Legislature would make clear that gravel mining cannot be prevented by a local ordinance. State Representative Wayne Schmidt from Traverse City voted for the bill last week when it passed committee. He says certain land uses should not be restricted by the whims of local planning boards.

“A lot of times it occurs when people are new to the area or are frustrated with some of the things going on,” says Schmidt.

Naturally, the Michigan Township Association opposes the bill since it reduces the authority of township governments. David Bertram directs the legislative work of the association. He told the committee there has to be a balance between the rights of property owners and their neighbors.

“You can’t possibly think because you bought five acres of land in a residential area that, because it’s sandy soil, you’re able to go start extracting it,” said Bertram.

Wind worries
MTA is also troubled that the language of the bill does not specifically mention gravel or sand. It says local ordinances will not prevent the extraction of “valuable natural resources.” Bertram says that could tie the hands of local governments that want to regulate other land uses, like where wind turbines are built.

“Our point is at a minimum if they are trying to talk about gravel then they need to refer to it as gravel or aggregate,” he says.

An alert from the Michigan Township Association caught the attention of a group in Benzie and Manistee Counties where Duke Energy is proposing to build more than 100 wind turbines between Arcadia and Frankfort. The group, Citizens for Responsible Wind Development, is fighting that project and a lot depends on what kinds of zoning rules the townships develop. The group sent out at least two emails urging members to contact their legislators.

But Scott Howard says there might not be much to worry about. Howard is a Traverse City attorney who specializes in municipal law. An attorney in his firm represented the property owner who sued Kasson Township. Howard sees two reasons why an energy company would be hard pressed to say this proposed law would apply to wind turbines. One is it mentions extraction, which implies something coming up out of the ground. And the legislation references a court decision that had to do with gravel mining.

“There’s no case that I’m aware of that extends that same doctrine to wind energy or extracting wind energy from the wind” says Howard. Whatever it means, the bill appears to be on a fast track. It was introduced last week but could see action in the full house this week. The Michigan Township Association thinks it could be on the governor’s desk by next week.

Source:  By Peter Payette, Interlochen Public Radio, ipr.interlochen.org 20 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.