LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Call for 15-fold increase on Darlington wind farm fees 

Credit:  By Paul Cook The Northern Echo, www.thenorthernecho.co.uk 21 June 2011 ~~

A wind farm developer should pay a 15-fold increase in planning fees to progress with plans to erect six turbines, according to an independent report.

Darlington Borough Council has given an assurance it will investigate the findings of the report for the site to the north-east of the town.

However, the applicant Banks Renewables – part of the County Durham-based Banks Group – is confident it has paid the correct fees.

Banks paid £17,465 for its initial application for ten turbines on the land at Moor House Farm, between the villages of Sadberge, Brafferton and Little Stainton.

The plans were refused and the company resubmitted an application for a smaller site.

No further fee was required.

However, opponents to the site believed the fee paid was too small and paid for an independent planning consultant to investigate.

Mike Sibthorp, from Lincolnshire, concluded in his report that the fee should have been themaximum of £250,000 because of the size of the site.

He said: “Our view is that the plans have calculated the area of the site to minimise the footprint. We would argue that if the correct fee has not been paid, then it is not a valid application until the correct fee is paid.”

Hebelieved it invalidated the second application and any appeal on the initial plans.

Ward councillor Brian Jones said he was waiting for feedback from the authority’s officers. However, he said further investigation was needed because of the “phenomenal difference” between the sums.

Justin Hancock, development planner at Banks Renewables, said: “A great deal of work always goes into ensuring that all our proposals are progressed in accordance with planning regulations, and we are wholly confident that everything was in order when we submitted the Moor House wind farm proposal.”

Darlington council has yet to determine the second application.

A spokeswoman said: “We are giving consideration to the letter and will be responding to the points made soon.”

The wind farm, for six turbines up to 125-metres high, would be the borough’s first and provide enough power for between 11,000 and 14,000 homes for 25 years.

Source:  By Paul Cook The Northern Echo, www.thenorthernecho.co.uk 21 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky