News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Scaled-back wind farm fails to win over critics  

Credit:  By HEATHER WYSOCKI, www.capecodonline.com 17 June 2011 ~~

BOURNE – The elimination of two turbines from the New Generation Wind project is a step in the right direction, but not the only step needed to ensure neighboring property owners are protected.

That’s the message opponents of the turbine project, proposed for an area of Bournedale, shared Thursday night with a Cape Cod Commission subcommittee tasked with reviewing the project.

Last week, proponents of the project announced a plan to eliminate two turbines, which they felt were the major source of nearby residents’ concern over the original seven-turbine proposal.

“We sincerely appreciate the removal,” said attorney Christopher Senie, who represents 29 residents whose homes are near the proposed turbines. “But the others are still very, very close to people who are sleeping at night.”

Senie and residents Jim Potter and Hendrik Luecke, representing Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy, suggested that the remaining turbines were still worrisome. “They obviously dominate the landscape,” Potter said during a showing of a 3-D simulation he created of the turbines.

Because the Cape Cod Commission’s regulations on shadow flicker, noise and health concerns were created after the New Generation Wind project was proposed, those issues will only be considered in an analysis of benefits versus detriments, not separately, regulatory officer Page Czepiga said.

During Thursday’s meeting, which was ongoing at the Times’ press deadline, residents, their legal representatives and several wind turbine experts discussed those benefits and detriments, agreeing that there was a mix of both but disagreeing at times as to which overshadowed the other.

“Of course they’re angry,” Glen Berkowitz of Boston-based Beaufort Windpower LLC said of Falmouth residents, who have reported ill effects from living near municipal turbines at that town’s wastewater treatment facility. But Berkowitz noted that a turbine in Hull, which is also near homes, has registered barely any complaints.

Source:  By HEATHER WYSOCKI, www.capecodonline.com 17 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.