[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farming isn't feasible here 

Credit:  www.roanoke.com 16 June 2011 ~~

Wind farming Appalachia is a bad idea. Windmills are ugly. They look like a very tall weed growing up from the mountain forest, like something outer space brought here from the movie “War of the Worlds.” The construction alone will destroy the mountainsides like strip mining.

Where is the public outrage? Are we so money hungry? Do we not care what our mountains look like?

The public is being deceived. In 2006, the wind energy industrial complex left the Roanoke Valley. Its studies revealed wind farming was not feasible here. So, why is this issue mysteriously returning?

Forcing a wind farm on the taxpayers of Roanoke County will result in higher utility bills for electricity, paying for the investment of the wind energy industrial complex. The Danes were led to believe wind farms were good. Now, knowing differently, they are protesting them.

I worked on large alternators/generators for 41 years. They will eventually mechanically fail. Hydroelectric and ground-mounted generators are not a problem. Here in the mountains, on top of a 278-foot tower, meltdown of molten metal and plastics will burn the mountains. Like the Danes, we will suffer the consequences of our deception.

No good reason for a wind farm

There has been a lot of propaganda from both sides relative to the proposed Poor Mountain wind farm project, or any other wind farm for that matter. Since there are existing wind farms and have been for many years, it would seem that if they were viable it should not even be arguable. The only conclusion is that they are unproven at best and a total failure at worst.

A logical process is simply to list all of the reasons for a wind farm, reasons against, and make a decision. So here goes. Reasons for: 1. Federal government subsidies and a temporary benefit to the local economy as the project is completed. 2. The contractor makes big bucks.

Reasons against: Every other possible aspect of the project, including long-term maintenance, noise, airplane flight patterns, destruction to the environment, unreliable and dubious source of power still requiring traditional backup and any other issue having anything to do with the actual performance and viability of the project. And this is being debated?

Source:  www.roanoke.com 16 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky