LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bourne wind-farm consultant says turbine 'reg' needs revision 

Credit:  Bourne Courier, www.wickedlocal.com 16 June 2011 ~~

BUZZARDS BAY —

The Bourne Board of Health conducted a 30-minute public hearing Wednesday night, inviting citizen input into the draft turbine regulation that members may approve June 29. The figurative elephant in the room remained the controversial New Generation Wind turbine plan off Scenic Highway and Route 25.

“We will take no new evidence tonight,” board chairman Kathy Peterson said. “We won’t listen to people’s experience with turbines. We’re only here to listen to input about the regulation, and that’s it. We’ll take all comments under advisement.

Consultant John Lipman of Brewster, representing New Generation, went first; saying “there is uncertainty with some aspects of the regulation” and requesting more time for re-writing, public comment and a 21-day review period prior to board approval.

“This is uncharted territory for any board of health,” Lipman said. “We’d like time to bring in some experts to answer technical questions.”

He questioned whether any turbine waiver should remain in the purview of the health board, which under the regulation would be required to review all wind-energy conversion system applications.

John Brennan of Bournedale credited the board “with a very good start” on its regulation, which was drafted in reaction to New Generation’s wind-farm proposal now in review by the Cape Cod Commission. He said the ‘reg’ needs a distinction, however, between a single structure application and a wind-farm.

Peterson said the regulation was written to focus on a single turbine. If multiple structures are planned, multiple permits would be needed, she said.

There was comment about noise, amplitude modulation, setbacks and environmental safety issues.

The regulation was largely drafted by board member Stanley Andrews with assistance by Associate Town Counsel Brian Wall.

There is varying interpretation of state law as to whether the health board turbine regulation, should it be adopted, would be applied to the New Generation Wind plan; if and when that plan proceeds from Cape commission scrutiny. The wind-farm proposal was filed long before the health board decided to write its regulation.

Source:  Bourne Courier, www.wickedlocal.com 16 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky