[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Put responsibility 
into the equation 

Credit:  www.bcrnews.com 13 June 2011 ~~

I urge the zoning board of appeals in Bureau County to not grant a variance for any wind turbine to be closer to a public road – especially a state highway. Even the 1.1 distance is not enough, but it should never be reduced further. This is an industrial machine that has moving blades! It can fall over, and it has the potential for the blades to shatter, and it has the potential to throw ice from a moving blade a long distance beyond the 1.1 distance you have in the ordinance.

As I travel Illinois, I am amazed at what counties are allowing, as to how close even cell phone towers are getting to the road right of way. As I drive by, I pray that something doesn’t happen. Has the county engineer and the county board members ever talked to someone who has lived near a tower? I did a short while ago, and she told me her mother used to worry when there was ice on the tower, as she was concerned that a chunk of ice might fall and hurt her, as she walked home from school.

I lost a good friend, a civil engineer, who was crushed in the prime of his life because a coal retaining wall was allowed to be built in the Chicago area, too close to the road. His wife sued, and she was compensated for her loss. But how do you compensate for the loss of a person’s life, who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time?

I hope Bureau County has good insurance as they will most likely be sued, along with the wind company, if a person or persons are ever injured or killed. The worst part of it, will be to explain to the grief stricken relatives how this variance was allowed. If I were a member of the zoning board or county board, I’d have a tough time looking them in the eyes and saying the risk was justified.

Please put responsibility back into the equation when dealing with industrial wind turbine placement, before it is too late and somebody gets injured or killed.

John Gebhardt, spokesperson for Advocates for Responsible Energy Development


Source:  www.bcrnews.com 13 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky