[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Objectors vow to carry on  

Credit:  Northumberland Gazette, www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk 8 June 2011 ~~

Objectors to a potential windfarm scheme have vowed they will not rest on their laurels after being told that there are currently no plans for a development close to their homes.

Panic erupted earlier this year when a map revealing nine turbines sited on the outskirts of villages such as Hadston, South Broomhill and Togston, as well as Druridge Bay Country Park and beach, was discovered.

The document, produced by Terence O’Rourke Ltd – planning consultants for wind power company Future Electric Limited – showed an indicative layout of a possible scheme, with some turbines less than 500 metres from houses, sparking fears of a proposal.

At the time, those behind the map – titled Birds Survey Boundaries – said that it was simply a review of a prospective site, at a very early stage and no formal application had been made.

And last week, we revealed that assurances had been given in a letter from Michael Davies, managing director of Future Electric Limited, that there are currently no windfarm proposals for the area.

But concerned residents are not convinced and have warned they will not give up the fight.

Linda Kull, who lives in Hadston, said: “That by no means allays our fears. The letter said that there are currently no plans for a windfarm. I don’t think by any means that we are in the clear. There could be a proposal and we will not rest on our laurels.”

In the letter, which was sent to Mrs Kull, as well as East Chevington Parish Council, Mr Davies said that wind power companies continually review prospective sites – such as the one in question – and these can easily eliminate a site for windfarm development just as easily as they can recommend it.

He added that the map was of very limited use and it had been passed in error to an ecology sub-consultant who had been sent to the site to review and advise on other issues and should have instead been given a map showing a land boundary for review.

But Mrs Kull said: “They are doing surveys, they are spending money and I think they are seriously looking at Hadston for a serious proposal.

“I just think they are playing this down and trying to appease us. There has been a group set up by local residents and there is a hard-core of us who are very much active against the windfarm and we will keep on going.”

Source:  Northumberland Gazette, www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk 8 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: