[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Where is scientific proof for position?  

Credit:  The Windsor Star, www.windsorstar.com 6 June 2011 ~~

Re: Energy platform: Hudak’s misinformation, Star editorial, June 1.

Firstly, what scientific data do you possess which shows that wind and solar are effective, efficient and clean? After four years of reviewing renewables energy, I have found it to be quite the opposite.

The hurdle I encounter in trying to understand the rationale behind this idea that “renewables” are effective alternatives and therefore an important part of our energy mix, is that such a position is based on some key assumptions.

For example, that all of our renewable choices are approximately equal regarding their cost-benefits; that renewables are comparable to our conventional sources; that using more renewables will make a consequential difference in our CO2 emissions; and that any CO2 reductions we get from renewables will make good economic sense.

I am just a simple farm girl but from the research I have done, I see zero real scientific evidence to support these assumptions. The collection of renewable options we have is a very heterogeneous group, not homogeneous, for example, industrial geothermal is radically different from industrial wind energy, in regards to technical compatibility, reliability, dispatchability, cost, environmental consequences, etc. And comparing nuclear to wind is like comparing an eighteenwheeler truck to a golf cart.

So my question to you is this. If I can figure this all out by myself, why can’t you? Exactly what is The Windsor Star advocating here and why?

Especially considering that it’s clear that citizens like myself, yes, I do live with industrial wind turbines in my backyard, must suffer significant negative consequences which include health effects, decreased property values, social implications, safety hazards with turbine collapses and ice throw, etc. from your ideological support of such non-solutions as industrial wind and solar energy?


Source:  The Windsor Star, www.windsorstar.com 6 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.