[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windfarm plan withdrawn  

Credit:  Morpeth Herald, www.morpethherald.co.uk 4 June 2011 ~~

A bid for a controversial windfarm in rural Northumberland has been withdrawn.

Renewable Energy Systems (RES) had applied for nine wind turbines near Wingates, which was vehemently opposed by local residents.

A public inquiry before a planning inspector was due to start on June 29, but it will no longer take place after the company’s request to postpone it for further assessments to be undertaken was refused by the Planning Inspectorate.

As a result, on Tuesday it withdrew its application for the Park Head site entirely, although it has not ruled out submitting a revised scheme.

The news has been welcomed by local campaigners, including Netherwitton resident Anne-Marie Trevelyan who has worked alongside the Wingates not Windfarms campaign team to oppose the development.

She said: “I am thrilled that the hard work of local people opposed to this development has paid off.

“It is testament to the power of local people to take control of their lives and say ‘no’ to overbearing multinationals in search of profit.

“However, RES may at some point decide to renew an application, so we will remain vigilant to future developments.”

Wingates residents are still preparing to face a smaller windfarm after the application by Infinis (Novera) for six turbines was approved by the county council committee in April.

An RES spokesman said: “Following the consent of Wingates Windfarm (the Infinis bid), we requested an adjournment for the Park Head Windfarm Public Inquiry.

“We requested to postpone the inquiry for a short time to allow for some further assessments to be undertaken. We felt a postponement was wholly appropriate in the circumstances and as it was refused we decided that our only effective option was to withdraw at this particular time. We are currently considering our options for submitting a revised scheme.”

Source:  Morpeth Herald, www.morpethherald.co.uk 4 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.