[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Petition was Highland's only option on project  

Credit:  Rose Staton Highland www.kjonline.com 1 June 2011 ~~

I was surprised when I read Rob Gardiner’s quote stating that he believes that a secret ballot vote would have been “healthier” than a petition for Highland residents.

I was present at the town meeting when Gardiner seemed uncomfortable at the thought of a symbolic vote opposing or supporting the wind project in our community.

Bill Lee, Highland’s lawyer, and the residents were discussing the possible tangible benefit package with Gardiner. Lee suggested that the assessors, the developers and the lawyers work up an agreement and bring it back to the town for a vote.

While I wanted Highland residents to get every benefit, I said I couldn’t vote yes for the package if LURC would perceive it as support. Lee suggested a vote would show support or opposition for the project. Gardiner said the vote would be unnecessary. Then, the town’s lawyer disagreed.

Since that time, tangible benefit negotiations have been ongoing.

The developers had manipulated the circumstances so that there would be no vote. I have gone to each month’s assessor’s meeting requesting a secret ballot vote. Our first assessor said that even if I brought a petition signed by the majority of Highland residents, the vote would not happen.

The assessors have worked hard for a tangible benefit package; I thank them. But I believe our vote was negotiated away. The residents’ alternative was a petition opposing the wind project.

To suggest that Highlanders signed this petition because of social pressure shows how little regard Gardiner has for the intelligence and determination of the residents. The benefit package would make residents’ financial lives easier, yet they signed willing because their quality of life is more precious.

Source:  Rose Staton Highland www.kjonline.com 1 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.