Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Council's fears over impact of Heslerton wind farm
Credit: By Dan Bean, Reporter, The Press, www.yorkpress.co.uk 2 June 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Concerns about the visual impact of a proposed Ryedale wind farm have been raised by a neighbouring local authority.
A report into the proposal at Heslerton, to the east of Malton, was carried out by Scarborough Borough Council in response to a consultation by planning officers at Ryedale District Council.
It said the artist’s impressions of the ten-turbine site submitted with planning application in March showed they would have a significant impact on the landscape of the Wolds, the Vale of Pickering, and the southern edge of the North York Moors.
While the report praised the efforts of developers RWE npower renewables to consider the points put forward by residents of nearby villages, it criticised the photo-montages provided with the planning application.
The report said the images, which were taken in bright sunlight following heavy snowfall, gave “a misleading impression of the prominence of the Wolds as a major landscape feature and blurs the distinction between the Vale of Pickering and the Wolds”.
It also criticised the lack of viewpoints of the proposed 126-metre site from the A170 east of Brompton and the A64, which it felt were “in locations where many more residents, car users or tourists will be aware of the wind farm”.
Martin Wood, from RWE, said: “A huge amount of work has gone into ensuring the design of the East Heslerton Wind Farm is sympathetic to the surrounding area.
“This process required that we consult with a wide range of organisations to understand and respond to any concerns, ahead of finalising our proposals.
“We are aware of the consultation response submitted by Scarborough Borough Council and, as with all the consultation responses submitted, we will give any issues raised due consideration prior to responding to Ryedale District Council.”
Protests about the application, due to go before planners later this month, have been submitted by the British Horse Society, Natural England, English Heritage, the Council to Protect Rural England, and the Ministry of Defence.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: