[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Changes will add hurdles  

Credit:  By Lynda Van Kempen, Otago Daily Times, www.odt.co.nz 31 May 2011 ~~

Much of Central Otago’s high country has been reclassified in the district plan as being an outstanding natural landscape, which may add more hurdles for developments such as wind farms to gain resource consent.

The Central Otago District Council has changed the way it classifies landscapes, as part of 23 changes to its district plan, affecting only the rural area.

It spent six weeks last year hearing submissions on the changes and announced its decisions this week. Submitters have 30 days in which to appeal those decisions to the Environment Court.

More than two-thirds of the 289 submissions received were about how the council identified and classified landscapes.

Environmental and recreational groups favoured greater protection against development, while power companies and wind-farm developers opposed tighter controls.

The council included a comment in its district plan changes about outstanding natural landscapes and features needing protection from inappropriate development, use and subdivision.

It listed the establishment of wind farms and transmission lines, telecommunications and other structures on skylines among the activities “that could potentially have an adverse impact on landscape values”.

Council hearing panel chairman John Lane said some of the changes were prompted by the Environment Court decision which cancelled resource consents for Meridian’s proposed 176-turbine wind farm on the Lammermoor Range.

“Obviously, we had to take cognisance of the Environment Court decision, in which they described the Lammermoors as an outstanding natural landscape, of national significance.”

Consents for the wind farm were granted by the council and Otago Regional Council in 2007, but the Environment Court, after hearing an appeal against those decisions, ruled the adverse effects of the proposed wind farm on the landscape outweighed its potential economic benefits.

The matter is still before the court. Meridian and the two councils appealed that decision to the High Court, which upheld the appeal after a hearing last year.

The case was sent back to the Environment Court to be reconsidered, with the court directed to hear more evidence on alternative locations for the wind farm.

Further evidence on those locations has to be lodged with the Environment Court by the end of January next year.

In its changes to the Central Otago district plan, the council has included extra areas as being outstanding, or nationally significant, landscapes.

They include the Lammermoor and Lammerlaw Ranges, the Rock and Pillar range, the Lindis area, the Rough Ridge and North Rough Ridges and the Old Man ranges above Roxburgh and Dumbarton.

“Essentially, we’ve run a contour line around it, where practicable, and the highest country features in the outstanding landscape category,” Mr Lane said.

Mr Lane said there was no ban on developments such as wind farms on that land.

“They would require resource consents, as they do now, but, it’s fair to say, they would have bigger hurdles to get across, to get the appropriate consents.” Under the changes, existing rural production in outstanding natural landscape areas has existing use rights.

New buildings, structures, roading, forestry or subdivision on that land are non-complying activities so resource consent would be needed, to allow the impact on the landscape to be assessed.

The council has decided on a three-tiered approach, with categories being outstanding natural landscapes, significant amenity landscapes and other rural landscapes. The first category has the greatest protection against development.

In submissions last year against the change, Contact Energy objected to the reference to wind farms and transmission lines as potentially having an adverse effect on the landscape.

Pioneer Generation also objected to the comment, saying it unnecessarily drew attention to those types of structures.

TrustPower opposed all 23 changes, saying they could affect the company maintaining and enhancing efficient electricity generation. The inclusion of wind farms in the statement was “emotive” and prevented proper consideration of the visual effects of wind farms at the time an application was made, it said.

Key areas

Outstanding natural features:
Sugarloaf glacial river terrace (terrace face near Lake Dunstan and Lowburn inlet); Bendigo glacial terrace (land above Loop Rd); rocky backdrop to Alexandra; Flat Top Hill; Upper Taieri scroll plain (extends in the Styx valley from Canadian Hut to the Paerau bridge and in the Maniototo from Hores bridge to the Waipiata bridge); Poolburn Gorge; Tiger Hill; Ophir Gorge.

Outstanding natural landscapes:
Kawarau Gorge; Butchers Dam locality; Cromwell Gorge; Elevated areas, Bendigo; Blue Lake/St Bathans backdrop; Old Man/Obelisk range including rangelands above Roxburgh and Dumbarton; Upper Manorburn/Poolburn/Serpentine; Lindis Pass; Pisa Range; Dunstan Mountains; Hector; Garvie and Old Woman ranges and part of Nevis Valley; Hawkdun; Ida and St Bathans ranges; Kakanui Mountains; Carrick Range; Horn Range; Rock and Pillar; Lammermoor and Lammerlaw Ranges; Rough Ridge and North Rough Ridge; Upper Manuherikia and Dunstan Creek.

Significant amenity landscapes:
Cairnmuir Range; Northern Knobby Range; Lowburn; Bendigo and Clyde terraces; terrace between Dunstan mountain and Waikerikeri valley; Raggedy Range; Blackstone Hills; Magdalen Hills; part of Nevis valley; Crawford Hills.

Source:  By Lynda Van Kempen, Otago Daily Times, www.odt.co.nz 31 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.