[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

An exceptional 
quality of life?  

Credit:  www.bcrnews.com 30 May 2011 ~~

I am writing in response to the article that appeared in last Thursday’s Republican titled, “Energy ‘toll road’ could go through Bureau, Henry counties.”

I am leery of companies with names like Clean Line Energy Partners which seem concocted by a public relations firm in a Michael Moore movie. I am doubly leery of a company that stages its only meeting in the county from 11 a.m. until 1 p.m. on a workday.

Therefore, my interest engaged, I asked a researcher who works with me to pull together what he could on direct-current transmission and Clean Line Energy Partners, and thanks to an introduction from a client, I then talked with the recently retired CEO of a major electrical transmission company.

After taking some teasing from the retired CEO about NIMBY—not in my backyard— I heard about the lack of national energy policy, and the difficulties of integrating wind power and direct-current transmission in particular into the power grid. Yet I gained some context for what I had read, and my being leery moved to skepticism to opposition to the project. To the point that I will do all that I can with regulators and legislators to resist the project in Bureau County and to foster public opposition.

My reasons?

First, transmission towers are unsightly and dangerous, making it difficult to sell homes within a several mile swath on the transmission lines and will reduce home values. This could very well be fatal for towns like Manlius, Kasbeer, Ohio and LaMoille. The county might benefit from the tax revenues and farmers from the leases, but hundreds of families would bear a terrible price and county’s property tax base would certainly erode.

Second, transmission lines generate coronas in winds that generate toxic compounds such as nitrogen oxide and ozone, and create the potential for making people sick.

Studies by the World Health Organization and the National Institute of Health have found statistical correlation between disease and living near high-voltage power lines, particularly childhood leukemia.

Third, I have come to doubt the project can be prudently capitalized.

Investors in Clean Line Energy Partners include the Zilkha family from Houston and Ziff Brothers Investments, a venture capital fund in New York who are wealthy, but not by the standards of utilities.

The Rock Island Clean Line will cost between $1.7 and $2 billion by its own estimates and will require significant debt in the form of junk bonds. In contrast, utilities have traditionally been well capitalized with high debt ratings. Chicago-based Exelon, for example has an enterprise value of $41 billion before its acquisition of Constellation Energy and an investment-grade credit rating.

If anything goes wrong – and things do go wrong and things do change – the spark spread shifts or Congress eliminates subsidies for wind power, The Rock Island Clean Line may not have staying power because of the high debt that will be incurred.

As you enter the county on Interstate 80, a billboard hails our “exceptional quality of life.” Let us not allow a project that could destroy that quality of life. We need development to be certain, but let us look to projects that develop the infrastructure of the county to our benefit, not to our detriment.

Gregory T. Carrott


Source:  www.bcrnews.com 30 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.